|
| ▲ | ben_w an hour ago | parent | next [-] |
| > Eating meat fills my belly. So do many other things which use less water. The estimates I've seen place the water consumption of water at such a low level that a whole month subscription consumes roughly as much water as 1-120 grams* of beef. > Setting my AC to 68 keeps me cool. What, is 70 not good enough? Air con, and basically all things connected to the power grid, also "costs [your] community money, damages the environment directly and indirectly, and further enriches a few already rich people." * yes, one to one hundred and twenty, there's that much uncertainty in the estimates for the AI. |
| |
| ▲ | magicalist 43 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | When Amazon gets to run an offgrid power plant for a new data centre that's permitted to release more co2 than any other single power plant in the US[1], you'll pardon me for wondering what the rush is and why it becomes literally everyone else's problem as a result. Build the data centre, sure, but if it takes you five years to build out the grid and sufficient generating capacity in a non stupid way in order to do that, sorry, but that's by far my preferred route to get there. [1] https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/08/climate/amazon-data-cente... | | |
| ▲ | ben_w 17 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Rush may be FOMO. Even as one who likes using AI, I think the economics is an investment bubble and mostly avoid it. I can't read your link, paywall, but my question regarding Musk's infamous polluting DC, I wonder why it had to be built near so many people. It's not like there's going to be a need for a huge pool of workers to commute to it. | | |
| ▲ | jacquesm 15 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Because they aren't really people unless they could afford a DC of their own. When you view half the world or more as NPC then it becomes trivially easy to ignore the needs of others. | | |
| ▲ | ben_w 8 minutes ago | parent [-] | | I fear you may be correct. On the other hand, how does that combine with his apparent narcissistic need to be seen? Is his need so simple it can be met with "line go up"? | | |
| ▲ | jacquesm 3 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Why would it have to be consistent? I've seen so many things be said and be done that do not mesh at al that this is really a very minor thing. Think about it, the list is just about endless by now it's hard to tell the lies from the intentions and the character deficits. |
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | DeluluDon an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | >Air con, and basically all things connected to the power grid, also "costs [your] community money, In what country do you not have an electric bill? | | |
| ▲ | ben_w 24 minutes ago | parent [-] | | It can be done even in rich countries, but the point is I think the opposite of your implication: I am claiming that it is hard to avoid causing costs to one's community (and that almost everything causes more impact than one might expect), I am not claiming to have achieved such avoidance. |
| |
| ▲ | jplusequalt 40 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | Does that water usage take into account all the water that went into training the models, including the electricity it took run the data centers the GPUs are housed in? | | |
| ▲ | ben_w 23 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Training is part of why there's two orders of magnitude range in the estimates. However, I believe yes, they do include energy production impact. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | fourseventy an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| You are posting on a website that is hosted in a data center right now. You use data centers at your job to send email, share documents, run software. When you go home and watch netflix, that video is streamed to you from a data center. All of the internet, your phone, and modern digital entertainment and life is run through data centers. My guess is that you don't seriously want to turn all of that off because 'reasons'. |
| |
| ▲ | Ydarbleoj 40 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | You are engaging in the "but you participate in society" fallacy. One can critique systems they are still interacting with, to suggest otherwise is just so incredibly lazy. | | |
| ▲ | rpdillon 26 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Not at all. The post being responded to completely failed to acknowledge any value brought by data centers to the general populous. That's disingenuous. To force the point: run me through the scenario where we turn off all the data centers. Consider how much more water will be have, how much less expensive will electricity be, and what other problems might arise. | | |
| ▲ | Ydarbleoj 15 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | But that value is subjective. If my tap water is brown as a result of a DC, I may not agree with your positives. If my neighborhood is humming all night because of a DC, again, I might not have the ability to see what you see as positive. So, my take is that maybe the pro-DC side can do better at seeing multiple perspectives instead of acting like anything negatively said about DCs is a psychosis. | |
| ▲ | mawadev 11 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | Turning off the datacenters would be horrible. We would literally be forced to go outside and touch grass. I wouldn't want to live in such a world. | | |
|
| |
| ▲ | DrewADesign 25 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Extremely resource-hungry GPU data centers have a much deeper impact on the surrounding area. The only data centers power hungry enough to install local turbines for power before the LLM craze were GPU-based crypto miners, and living next to one of those also sucks pretty hard. One person I saw interviewed described the sound of the gas turbines like having a clogged shop vac in your house 24/7. If you look into it even briefly, you’ll see that you can’t honestly equate their impact to standard CPU server farms. | |
| ▲ | kraquepype 28 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | We could do all of that before the most recent datacenter build outs. Existing datacenters at the scale we were used to were just fine for what was expected of them. | |
| ▲ | Symbiote an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | All of those are the old, smaller scale. | | |
|
|
| ▲ | ryanisnan an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| What a weird line to draw. Data centres do a lot more than what you report. E.g. they might host your electronic health records. They might host census data, or weather data, or your kid's school learning management system. |
|
| ▲ | mr_00ff00 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| People say this and then use AI for literally everything they do. |
| |
| ▲ | cryzinger 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | In my experience, there's not a ton of overlap between people who say this and people who use AI for everything they do... but most people who say this do use social media, cloud storage, on-demand video streaming, and plenty of other things that rely on data centers :) Not for nothing that YouTube alone is responsible for a double-digit amount of all internet traffic. | |
| ▲ | xboxnolifes 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I think this is just projection. | |
| ▲ | dasil003 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Consider that there may be large populations doing both, but the overlap might be less than the internet jockey concludes via finger-in-the-wind hypocrisy check. | |
| ▲ | windexh8er an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The interesting thing is: they don't. Most people not on HN could give two shits about an AI generated overview on Google search, in fact if you asked most people of age they'd rather have a Google Search that worked vs what we have now. Just because the bubble here uses AI doesn't mean it's even remotely valuable for the 80%. But they've done a great job convincing a specific group of people this. | |
| ▲ | Ydarbleoj 39 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | You are engaging in the "but you participate in society" fallacy. One can critique systems they are still interacting with, to suggest otherwise is just so incredibly lazy. | | |
| ▲ | rpdillon 24 minutes ago | parent [-] | | This is a copy-pasted comment from elsewhere in the thread, which I've already responded to. A bit much calling others "incredibly lazy". |
|
|
|
| ▲ | whimsicalism 43 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| "i can't eat a cargo container so it's useless" -guy who can only see one level up the chain of abstractions that allow him to fill his belly. |
|
| ▲ | vmchale 31 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > A data center costs my community No one was objecting when pornhub was building out data centers. Anything they like to consume, no matter how frivolous, is accepted as morally better on a metaphysical level. > further enriches a few already rich people. Meat eaters damaging the Earth is okay because it's "equal"? 300 million people deciding they're entitled to consume anything they want in ever-increasing quantities is a problem because... there's 300 million of them! |
| |
| ▲ | kennywinker 18 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Listen, I am no meat advocate. I just see a very clear link between the resources required to make meat and the benefit to the person eating the meat. Where data centers cause local and global harm, while not benefitting the locale or the globe. Which is why people don’t like them. And it’s not like non-meat is fine - the corn industry uses a blinding amount of water, as do almonds, etc. We have a finite budget for water usage, and i’d allocate that to non-meat food > virtually anything else > meat > data centers > golf courses. > No one was objecting when pornhub was building out data centers I’m not entirely sure of the scale of pornhub’s operations, but i feel like one large ai data center uses more resources than all of pornhub’s data center usage around the globe. But maybe i’m wrong there, and the hub was just flying under the radar. |
|
|
| ▲ | himata4113 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| It directly and indirectly increases your quality of life and it is something you use every single day. |
|
| ▲ | ETH_start 7 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Data centers generate export revenue. For a country that has struggled to export as much as it imports, that seems very valuable to its national economic health, and sabotaging one of the few major export industries, and one that's growing rapidly at that, seems counterproductive. Data centers also generate local tax revenue. In fact, across industries, they have the best tax revenue to tax resource burden ratio, using very little government services while paying significant property tax. And the environmental damage, whatever that is, is negligible relative to other industries. Their only output is some noise pollution nearby and whatever emissions are produced in the power plants that give them electricity. All industries require electricity in proportion to how much economic value they produce. So unless you want degrowth and no industry, you're going to have energy consumption. They do use water but their water usage is mininscule compared to agribusiness, or even fast food restaurant or golf courses. And the water usage can be brought down. They just use the water for cooling. So they could use treated wastewater or recycle the water they use. This is not a major long-term concern. Not one that justifies sabotaging this key emerging industry. In fact, rising energy consumption is a sign of a growing economy. That's why China has seen its energy consumption grow far faster than any other major economy while its economy has also grown far faster. |
|
| ▲ | ares623 17 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The datacenter means I don't have read/write YAML anymore. Checkmate. I would burn the world than ever deal with YAML again. |
|
| ▲ | jmmcd 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| AC at 68F is obnoxious and wasteful. At least data centres enable me to communicate with distant colleagues, watch enriching movies, and use very strong AI tools to accelerate my research. |
| |
| ▲ | AnthonyMouse 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > AC at 68F is obnoxious and wasteful. It's actually significantly more environmentally friendly than heating to above 68F in the winter in most cases, since most AC is done with heat pumps but most heating is oil/gas (100% fossil fuel consumption) or resistive electric heaters (dramatically less efficient than heat pumps). On top of that AC use aligns strongly with solar generation output while heating load does the opposite, which means that even when heating is done with electricity it comes disproportionately from gas turbines at natural gas peaker plants. | |
| ▲ | atmavatar an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | Data centers also enable the NSA to store the metadata and contents of every phone call you make and police to (without a warrant) to track anyone who's walked in front of your doorbell or many street corners in your city. They also store all the location data your phone collects for Google or Apple, nearly your entire internet history collected surreptitiously because many sites automatically use your GMail or Facebook logins, and your entire purchase history collected via Visa or MasterCard. And even better: all of that data is aggregated together and stored in its entirety several times over across multiple data centers because everyone shares your data with everyone else, such that if any single of more than a dozen data centers is ever compromised, it all gets leaked to whomever compromised it. |
|