| ▲ | anthonj 4 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I see your point, but what i'm talking about is the company generating a strong incentive to people to buy upgrades or replacements. This whole submission is about a user going extra length to recover a perfectly functioning main board (with price between 400 and 800 eur depending on model) after an official update went wrong and was suggested to buy a new one. Mind that I am planning to buy one as well, so I don't have a bias against it. But those suspicious "features" pulled me away from the 16" model for example. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | throwuxiytayq 2 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> a perfectly functioning main board If I understand correctly, the problem was that the board was the exact opposite of that. The post title uses the phrase “bricked”. I agree that FWs handling was pretty bad, but then again, what exactly is the proposed ideal-but-realistic solution they should have offered here? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||