| ▲ | CompoundEyes 7 hours ago |
| I used over a billion tokens per day of gpt-5.6 sol xhigh starting last Wednesday through Sunday before reaching my reset limit. The $200 pro plan is still the best deal. |
|
| ▲ | ec109685 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| I spent $800 in a few hours when my sub maxed out because I was trying to get something done and had a long car ride to let it churn. Their api pricing is absurdly expensive. |
| |
| ▲ | giancarlostoro 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > Their api pricing is absurdly expensive. I assume at this point that it subsidizes subscriptions. | | |
| ▲ | timClicks 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Subscriptions are a mechanism to attract developers, who then advocate that their company should use the API. | |
| ▲ | qingcharles 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Massively subsidized. As soon as my Claude switches from subscription to overage I have to tap out quickly. | | |
| ▲ | skohan 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | This is a big part of the reason I went local-only. Subscription limits are horrible for having a decent workflow. |
| |
| ▲ | HeWhoLurksLate 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | yes, it absolutely does. I've gotten more work done on a second chatgpt pro $100/mo subscription than I did with ~$150 of paying for usage through the app. |
| |
| ▲ | paxys 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Because API pricing is for corporations and subscriptions are for consumers. | | |
| ▲ | blitzar 31 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | I thought corporations were meant to be smart and get b2b / volume discounts - not pay 5-10x what the man in the street is paying. | | | |
| ▲ | wmf 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Are we supposed to just shrug at the idea of businesses paying 10x more for raw materials than consumers? How long can this go on? | | |
| ▲ | kelvinjps10 an hour ago | parent [-] | | Hopefully for a long time this is like the beginnings of a vac startup, enjoy while you can before the enshitification comes |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | SJMG 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| A billion a day? How many agents are you running? |
| |
| ▲ | _zoltan_ 34 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | with ultracode, it goes fast. I can easily get to a billion on a busy day. | |
| ▲ | greenavocado 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | That's wild. I was gonna say 3-5 billion a month is more reasonable summed across all token types. |
|
|
| ▲ | infinite_spin 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I have mine churning like butter and I'm rarely hitting a billion tokens per day, what's your workflow look like? |
| |
| ▲ | CompoundEyes 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Pretty basic. The codex app with one conversation per project and several running simultaneously all hours. I’m going for max caching that way and it never gets lost even with compaction somehow. Each has a plan with milestones to keep up to date and a thin agents file. I check in on them in the Remote app. Use case is protocol and control reverse engineering of audio hardware. I think they must be identifying the heavy use agent sessions and cranking up their cache lives so it’s not a big deal for them. | | |
| ▲ | rpdillon 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | A billion tokens a day is 11,000 tokens a second sustained. How many tokens per second are you getting off of GPT 5.6 Sol per project? | | |
| ▲ | sheepscreek 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Ultra mode spins up many sub-agents. On a particularly challenging task, I’ve had as many as 29 agents working at one time. Also if you don’t specify, most end up being the same as the parent model which is pretty wasteful. I engineered a skill that spins up Terra High agents for most sub-agents, resorting to Sol Medium for technical research and Luna High for code/in-project research tasks. On a slightly different topic, Luna Max is incredibly capable and doesn’t use as much quota (Luna tokens are dirt cheap). | | |
| ▲ | iJohnDoe 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | Most importantly, are you seeing a return on investment for time and ultimate outcome? No one can judge the enjoyment, learning, and hobby aspects. Just wondering if there is an end goal for that much overall expenditure (time, money, energy, etc.) | | |
| ▲ | _zoltan_ 33 minutes ago | parent [-] | | I absolutely see a return. I do not pay for this (we have a corporate gateway), for the price of a junior developer I can get 3-4-5 senior developer's work done. it's insane value. |
|
| |
| ▲ | jeffmcjunkin 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Often people are counting all tokens, including cached input tokens, for those more impressive "billions of tokens" quotes. | | |
|
| |
| ▲ | ramraj07 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Some people just do crazy stuff. For example this now ex yc guy who said he has agents constantly scanning Sf govt apis and forming dashboards just because | | |
| ▲ | jimbob45 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | Is anyone hitting caps without agents or API usage? Seems very difficult. | | |
| ▲ | brookst 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | Yeah I am, building large software with a vision - requirements - architecture - plan - code workflow. One Claude max account is enough to work on one, maybe two of those at a time (call it 15B tokens/month per project) |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | dyauspitr 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I’m exclusively using ultra and I run out in 3-4 days consistently. Those resets are great but I’ve noticed they like to cluster them at the start of the cycle, would be better if they spaced them out more. |
|
| ▲ | IshKebab 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| A billion tokens per day?? Plausible estimates put the energy use at about 0.001 Wh/token, which means you're using 1000 kWh/day in electricity, just to generate slop. That's about the same as 50-100 houses. 300kg of CO2 per day - roughly the same as flying from London to New York every three days. I think on average AI energy usage is not as big a deal as everyone is panicking about, but your usage is truly absurd and I don't know how you can live with that. It's immoral. |
| |
| ▲ | Gangway0829 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I can't speak for that guy, but I'm a physicist and work in clean energy... So it's not too hard! That said, I usually am closer to 10M on days I do heavy coding, so not nearly that bad. | |
| ▲ | paxys 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Token caching is a thing | |
| ▲ | throwup238 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | You really think OpenAI is selling $1500/mo of electricity (at $0.05/kwh) for $200/mo? I’m guessing that Wh/token estimate is several orders of magnitude too high. | | |
| ▲ | Noaidi 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | They certainly could be using that much electricity at a loss based on their profitability, which doesn’t exist. Leaked financial documents from 2025 show the company reported an operating loss of approximately $20.9 billion against $13.1 billion in revenue. | | |
| ▲ | blovescoffee 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | As a company... but that includes things like research costs, model training etc. to determine if they're selling electricity at a loss you should look at inference costs bc that's the "thing" they're selling |
|
| |
| ▲ | _zoltan_ 32 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | "slop"? come on. we're not in 2020 anymore, Dorothy. | |
| ▲ | pertymcpert 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Most tokens are cached. | |
| ▲ | lannisterstark 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | 1. You do not know what they're using it for.
2. Get off your high horse please.
3. Immoral my ass. | | |
|
|
| ▲ | jm4 7 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| I can’t sign up for that. I tried authorizing Codex a couple days ago. For some reason, their system says my phone number has been used for verification 3 times even though it definitely has not. I’ve had this phone number for over 20 years. OpenAI support is useless. They just keep repeating the policy without actually helping me. |
| |
| ▲ | weakened_malloc 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Use TextVerified, load up like $5 of credit and OAI verification is like $1.00. Then when your account is made, ensure 2FA/passkey is setup then you don't need to worry about the phone number. | | | |
| ▲ | _345 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Yes I filed a support ticket with them and explained that their system is broken and they just did not care. I explained how it was impossible for me to use it 3 times already as I've only made 2 chatgpt accounts EVER, and only recalling entering my phone number for one of the two chatgpt accounts. I told them that this issue locked me out of codex and chatgpt for work and they weren't willing to do anything about it. Totally useless support. I ended up borrowing my gf's phone number just so I could get access for work. Ridiculous | |
| ▲ | jaggederest 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Get a burner and use it? If you're spending $200/mo on something, $40 or whatever for a burner phone seems like a pretty cheap price. | | |
| ▲ | paxys 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | You can get a phone number online for a few dollars. | | |
| ▲ | jaggederest 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | Historically those are less useful because some of the verification systems require a real phone number and that your name is associated with the account, depending on what and how they verify. It's annoying, I use a google voice number as my primary, and it often gets rejected. | | |
|
|
|
