| ▲ | lz400 a day ago | ||||||||||||||||
It's all so sketchy. Jane Street were investors in SA but presumably were much more sophisticated and savvy than Leopold. When SA got in trouble, 3 firms got into a bid war for the assets at fire sale prices: Citadel, Jane Street and a third I forgot. Citadel outbid the other 2, but it's all weird, like Jane Street wanted in on the popular boy's book that they knew was going to tank and just were waiting around in the water like sharks. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | JumpCrisscross a day ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
Nothing about any of that is sketchy. It’s in their mutual interest to avoid a fire sale. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | Aurornis a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
> like Jane Street wanted in on the popular boy's book that they knew was going to tank This is completely illogical. If they knew it was going to tank, they wouldn’t invest. As conspiracy theories go, this one doesn’t even have a leg to stand on. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | catchnear4321 a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
is it unreasonable to say that Jane Street was simply paying a small price for some situational awareness? | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | EdwardDiego a day ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
[dead] | |||||||||||||||||