| ▲ | pipes 10 hours ago | |
It seems to have become a given since he won the election, before this, the coverage of binface in the run up to this election has been endkess. If no one in the BBC or elsewhere thought he had a chance of winning, no one would have bothered reporting it. Binface has been around for years, he never received this level of coverage before. Its pretty obvious that the bbc's natural bias against any anything right of soft left is why he got this much coverage from them. | ||
| ▲ | xboxnolifes 9 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
Again, the coverage was to prevent Farage from controlling the narrative, not to win. And because there was only 1 "serious" candidate running, what else are they going to air about the election? What other election has binface been involved in where there was only one "serious" candidate in to put coverage toward? Literally nobody seriously involved before or after actually believed binface would win outside of some technical possibility. Seriously, find even a single forecast that he could realistically win the election. Politics is bigger than a single election. The goal wasn't to win here, it would have just been a really funny outcome if it happened. | ||
| ▲ | dofm 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
FWIW, Farage owes _most_ of his cultural visibility to the BBC's tendency to interview him, feature him on Question Time. He's been on that show nearly forty times! Binface and Farage will have got more or less equal time on the BBC for this election, because a) the rules demand it and b) Reform would kick up a fuss. | ||
| ▲ | pessimizer 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
> the bbc's natural bias against any anything right of soft left Or left of soft left. Anybody who will change anything politically is an enemy of the BBC. They have a bias towards backroom deals between near-relatives. | ||