| ▲ | throwawaypath 12 hours ago |
| Deportations should be efficient and swiftly follow after apprehension. Delay only funnels public funds to companies such as these. |
|
| ▲ | kelseyfrog 10 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| What false positive rate are you willing to accept? |
| |
| ▲ | JuniperMesos 10 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | A pretty high rate, because it's pretty easy for an actual US citizen who gets accidentally deported to simply re-enter the country. | | |
| ▲ | blamestross 9 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | What does that look like? Dropped in a foreign country without money or documents. Likely in the custody of a government who doesn't care. How do you re-enter the country? | | |
| ▲ | downrightmike 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | Whatever country will accept the lowest bribe. So likely somewhere in Africa. SA would be too close, almost walk back |
| |
| ▲ | kelseyfrog 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Curious what that translates to numerically, if you're willing to share. |
| |
| ▲ | throwawaypath 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Did you reply to the wrong comment? | | |
| ▲ | kelseyfrog 9 hours ago | parent [-] | | No. What false positive rate for deportations are you willing to accept? | | |
| ▲ | throwawaypath 9 hours ago | parent [-] | | >What false positive rate for deportations are you willing to accept? Your comment is a non sequitur. What false positive rate for the justice system are you willing to accept? | | |
| ▲ | kelseyfrog 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | Bruh. It's a number between 0% and 100%. I'll make it a yes or no answer to help you, and we'll narrow it down from there. For example, are you willing to accept a 50% false positive rate? Yes or no? Ex: For every two people deported, one of them would be deported erroneously. | | |
| ▲ | throwawaypath 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | Bruh. It's a number between 0% and 100%. I'll make it a yes or no answer to help you, and we'll narrow it down from there. For example, are you willing to accept a 50% false positive rate? Yes or no? Ex: For every two people convicted and jailed, one of them would be convicted and jailed erroneously. | | |
| ▲ | kelseyfrog 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | Why try to counter with a "no u!" It makes it look like you know deporting people falsely is bad. Why not just change your position instead? | | |
| ▲ | throwawaypath 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | Why try to counter with a "no u!" It makes it look like you know falsely convicting and jailing people is bad. Why not just change your position instead? | | |
| ▲ | kelseyfrog 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | > It makes it look like you know falsely convicting and jailing people is bad. Um, yeah? Falsely convicting people and jailing them is bad. | | |
| ▲ | throwawaypath 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | And that has nothing to do with efficient and swift deportations. Congrats, you played yourself. | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | Arodex 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Yeah, it is not as if the people deported have family, children, pets, belongings, responsabilities... /s |
|
| ▲ | hightrix 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Yes, but where’s the cruelty that this administration so strongly desires? These people need to be punished for what they’ve done regardless of if they’ve done it. Additionally, efficiency means lower revenue and that simply can’t happen. |
| |
| ▲ | cwmoore 10 hours ago | parent [-] | | Something about “cruel and unusual punishment” has never sat well with me. |
|
