| ▲ | kelseyfrog 7 hours ago |
| Bruh. It's a number between 0% and 100%. I'll make it a yes or no answer to help you, and we'll narrow it down from there. For example, are you willing to accept a 50% false positive rate? Yes or no? Ex: For every two people deported, one of them would be deported erroneously. |
|
| ▲ | throwawaypath 6 hours ago | parent [-] |
| Bruh. It's a number between 0% and 100%. I'll make it a yes or no answer to help you, and we'll narrow it down from there. For example, are you willing to accept a 50% false positive rate? Yes or no? Ex: For every two people convicted and jailed, one of them would be convicted and jailed erroneously. |
| |
| ▲ | kelseyfrog 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | Why try to counter with a "no u!" It makes it look like you know deporting people falsely is bad. Why not just change your position instead? | | |
| ▲ | throwawaypath 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | Why try to counter with a "no u!" It makes it look like you know falsely convicting and jailing people is bad. Why not just change your position instead? | | |
| ▲ | kelseyfrog 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | > It makes it look like you know falsely convicting and jailing people is bad. Um, yeah? Falsely convicting people and jailing them is bad. | | |
| ▲ | throwawaypath 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | And that has nothing to do with efficient and swift deportations. Congrats, you played yourself. | | |
|
|
|
|
