| ▲ | shevy-java 2 hours ago | |
I kind of assumed that they actually meant UK. It's indeed confusing. I'd wish the BBC would use a consistent naming scheme. Guess only England was meant. That would insinuate they don't care about scotland though. | ||
| ▲ | alibarber 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
I don't understand. It's an article about England. They only have information to hand about England, from the authority tasked with dealing with health in England. If I read an article from them about crime in London, quoting the Metropolitan Police, I don't immediately think that they don't care about, say, the West Midlands. | ||
| ▲ | Blazara an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
The BBC do use a consistent naming scheme, you're just not understanding the scheme. Scotland has their own devolved NHS, and track their own health statistics. Scotland not being mentioned is because the Hepatitis C Trust were talking about England's Hep C numbers, it wasn't an intentional slight on Scotland. | ||
| ▲ | reorder9695 an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Confusingly the proper term for England, Scotland, Wales, and NI is country individually, the UK is a country of countries. They should probably be called states but they never have been, I'd pretty much always assume when someone says England to become the first country... that they mean England exclusively. The bit that gets me is that people often refer to the UK but actually mean GB or vice versa. | ||