I read the entire article. Did you? There’s no reason in there to expose this company’s clients.

Edit - Are you capable of answering my actual question or was that the best you could do?

mikestew 26 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

Read the article again, then. Anyone that has could get the list with a trivial amount of work. Security through obscurity isn’t going to hide that client list.

And who knows? Maybe someone competent whose company is a client will see that list and say, “hey, boss, I was on HN today, and…”

▲

root-parent 32 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

He has been emailing the CEO for six months with no replies. This is has also been posted here before with not a single pip or comment ... :-)

And these customers absolute lack of technical due diligence, on this nth example, of move fast and break things...makes them deserve what they are getting.

▲

Oras 14 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

Technical due diligence do not including pep test!

▲

dpark 21 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

> And these customers absolute lack of technical due diligence, on this nth example, of move fast and break things...makes them deserve what they are getting.

That’s a garbage take. These customers didn’t move fast or break things. They trusted a company that made a promise and that company let them down.

	▲	root-parent 13 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		>> They trusted a company that made a promise and that company let them down. That is a Boeing and Volkswagen type of excuse. The engineers did it!