Remix.run Logo
sajithdilshan 3 hours ago

Still needs 32-64GB memory to run it locally. 64GB Macbook pro with an M5 chip costs more than 4k Euros in Germany. A more practical model would be a language specific (e.g Python or JVM language) and excellent at tool calling and reasoning. Maybe that way they can shrink it even more.

ComputerGuru 6 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

There is no good reason to believe language-specific models are going to be any meaningfully smaller, just worse. Same as English-only models vs those trained on a multilingual corpus.

eigenspace 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I think if there's going to be advantages to making smaller, more targeted models, those advantages will probably come from targeting specific domains, not from targeting specific languages.

I think that if an LLM can't abstract over the differences between Python and C++, it probably will have an even harder time abstracting over the differences between writing code that manages a webserver, and writing code that does aerodynamic simulations.

karimf 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Practically ~20GB with KV cache

> We quantize weights to ~4-bit, bringing the LM under 20 GB. We validated minimal to no degradation on agentic tasks under compression.

https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1vkgsum/introdu...

Gecko4072 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

There have been discussions on language specific not really being a relevant change to reduce size.

Manfrednotfunny 3 hours ago | parent [-]

I would love to see any good research projects about it but i have the feeling that Frontier with MoE is making too fast of a progress so that a customized model would always be worse and that the MoE part is actually going somehow in this direction.

On the other hand, at the GTC was a talk about coding in different lanugage (like spanish) and explaining that the quality between spanish and english is relevant different.

But i have not found a good article about the impact of learning data with practical experiments or even if the order of the learning data matters.

At least I think i remember that Meta mentioned having better and less data can be better than more data with lower quality.

As long as these models can explain to you facts about any other topics, its still overfitted for the task though.

mapontosevenths 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Capability in LLM's is distributed throughout the manifold in subspaces. Even worse, the subspaces exist in superposition.

That is to say, there is no single 'python' part of the model. The python bit is spread throughout the entire model and overlaps with other pieces that have similar, but unrelated, capabilities. For example the python subpspace might be partially in superposition with cupcake recipes, Esperanto, and calculus. We need calculus in a coding agent but not the other two. However, separating them cleanly is almost impossible, and even identifying them is tough.

Internally the manifolds are highly inefficient and nothing like you would imagine something humans built would be designed. It's more like something that evolved in nature.

Manfrednotfunny 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

My current image from a MoE is that the base/core might be the more generic thing and that things like python are part of one expert though.

mapontosevenths an hour ago | parent [-]

With MOE you train a router designed to select which parts to activate. The router itself is a trained neural network and the 'experts' are usually not really things like 'python'. They're just the functional subspaces I described above.

Again, those subspaces are all somehow inextricably correlated and live in complex superposition spread throughout the manifold. The router doesn't know (or care) WHY those sections get lit up it just learns which ones to activate to optimize it's own reward function. So maybe it learns to activate "logic", "python" and "cupcake recipes in esperanto" whenever it see's something that kind of looks like python. It's not the best answer, it's just the best answer the tiny router could figure out.

It's all wildly complicated and inefficient, and works nothing like any reasonable human would imagine that it SHOULD operate.

dist-epoch 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

There was some paper about routing at training bio-knowledge into a particular region of the model, which you then can cutoff when serving. But you probably lose some efficiency since maybe you sized that region too small/too big.

mapontosevenths an hour ago | parent [-]

That's a very clever approach. Any idea about the papers title or authors? I'd love to look it up.

dist-epoch 39 minutes ago | parent [-]

https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.04332

https://alignment.anthropic.com/2025/selective-gradient-mask...

mihaelm 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I'm sooo happy I pulled the trigger on upgrading and getting a new laptop (with 64 GB RAM) last summer. Feels like it was just in time before the exponential price jumps.

xscott 42 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

I kick myself a couple times a week for not getting the 512GB Mac Studio in February. I was holding out for an M4 or M5 chip...

drob518 11 minutes ago | parent [-]

I was about a week away from buying a very tricked out MacBook Pro with 128 GB RAM, but was on vacation and worried about it arriving while I was away, and then the price hikes went into effect. Grumble. Oh, well. Serves me right.

ishtanbul 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Pulled the trigger?

mihaelm 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

lol, you're right, the brainfart completely changes the meaning.

I corrected it.

idiotsecant 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Common phrase.

karolist 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Parent used "pulled the plug", are you saying it's applicable here and not "pulled the trigger" like suggested?

Hinrik 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

That commenter you're replying to knows that. The original commenter before them wrote "pulled the plug" which is different and doesn't quite apply here (actually implies the opposite of what they meant to say).

3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]
[deleted]
mettamage 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Bought an M1 64 GB for 2000 euro’s second hand a year ago. That was sweet

karolist 3 hours ago | parent [-]

paid 2.7k € for this same build new in Dec 2023, that was also sweet (still is)

drob518 17 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The machines that can run this are pricey, but not beyond a high end developer machine.

dbbk 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Well if you're spending thousands on API tokens already, you could just drop the same amount on a 128GB MacBook Pro and that's a one time cost.

smallerize 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

If you're dropping thousands on API tokens, you're going to be slowed down at least 10x trying to do everything on a single MBP.

dannyw an hour ago | parent [-]

But you could grab a 5090, and paired with some DRAM for MoE offloading of bigger models, and be a happy camper with 1.8TB/s of memory bandwidth.

Or just use Luna honestly. Worth considering if you’re ok with hosted APIs.

Gigachad an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The models people are spending thousands on require more on the range of 600-800gb memory.

128gb hardly runs deepseek v4 flash which is almost free via api pricing.

neuroticnews25 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Don't forget about energy usage, you'll probably never break even vs same model on openrouter.

jurgenburgen 2 hours ago | parent [-]

If you can’t do it cheaper on your own hardware it does make you wonder how much of the cost of inference those large LLM providers are eating? Datacenter hardware isn’t magic.

flaunf221 an hour ago | parent | next [-]

Your personal hardware probably isn't running useful tasks 24/7. If you spend 60% of your 8h work day on full on agentic work, then your hardware is paying off for itself only 20% of available time.

petu 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Datacenter hardware can batch at large scale, probably over 90% more energy efficient per token than a MacBook.

Der_Einzige 29 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

Datacenter hardware might as well be magic compared to consumer. "Oh the F35 isn't magic compared to my M16 bro!"

solarkraft 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I feel like we’ve had this discussion before. From what I remember, specialized models rarely do that much better than general ones, hence no mode Codex models.

Archit3ch 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> 64GB Macbook pro with an M5 chip costs more than 4k Euros in Germany

Sure, if you want the latest and almost* greatest. You can pick up an M1 Max 64GB for ~1k.

* I guess 128GB also exists

sparkling 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Even if you had a 64GB machine: Are you willing to reserve 90% of your memory to run a LLM? With dirt cheap models like deepseek-v4-flash that will run "forever" on $10, the answer for me is clearly: no.

Manfrednotfunny 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I'm waiting for the speed/quality per dollar metric to go down a little bit further and then I will def run it at home.

Its not just that you send a sentence to an API endpoint, you always send EVERYTHING to that agent as a context.

You want to analyse your spending history? You now send everything to someone.

Either no one cares but understands this implication on how easy it is to really capture you or no one really things about it.

But i'm a lot more diligent on what I send. I disabled the gemini activity feature for example because google started telling me that my stuff could be reviwed by humans.

plufz 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Yeah, it does feel a bit silly with my encrypted disks, encrypted backups, unique passwords, advanced router, etc, while I send everything I do in plain text to anthropic.

zbendefy 16 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

Similiarly I wonder why we dont run our own email server despite the sensitive data there.

zoobab 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

"With dirt cheap models like deepseek-v4-flash that will run "forever" on $10, the answer for me is clearly: no."

When it's free, you are the product.

IMTDb 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Deepseek flash is open weight, this means we can download and run that model without any connection to deepseek, no data/tokens/usage data ever reaches them. They cannot make us their product.

Gigachad an hour ago | parent [-]

All those random api providers are absolutely scooping up your data though. And the hardware to run it locally is absurdly expensive.

prplxd_nihilist 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I see many people saying deepseek and other chinese providers have always been profitable. Also they show their training costs publicly. Can't say for sure since I have not used it personally, but I think they'll for sure outlive the western SOTAs.

LogicFailsMe an hour ago | parent [-]

OpenAI apparently runs a profitable inference business with 40% gross margin, but their advertising budget is nutso and their real costs are pretraining and research. I suspect Deepseek's comp is not predicated on capturing the lightcone of all future value, some googling insinuates their top pay is $212K US which would support that suspicion. Compare and contrast with the $1.35M and up at OpenAI.

amrit3128 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Ah yes, I'm sure Trovalds and Stallman are harvesting my data through free software, aren't they? This argument is used by boomers who were fed cold war era propoganda that surely everybody is selfish, and you're always at fault.

kipchak 12 minutes ago | parent [-]

Think they're talking about things that are free as in beer but not free as in freedom, not FOSS

halJordan 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

It's the size of a big vm. There's nothing wrong with reserving that much working space for one item.

formerly_proven 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

4K bucks buys you around 180 months of <insert AI subscription here> with zero upfront cost.

skohan an hour ago | parent | next [-]

If you don't mind exfiltrating all your IP to the API provider

zamalek 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Problem is that might go away or get nerfed.

ody4242 2 hours ago | parent [-]

then you switch provider, it's not a monopoly

Mistletoe 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Haha wow. I’m trying to even imagine the AI landscape in 15 years and I can’t.

cynicalsecurity 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I don't understand the desire to run own AI models for programming locally. No laptop is ever going to be as powerful and energy efficient to run anything close to OpenAI, Anthropic or Google models. A model you can run on a loptop is simply not going to work as well as it's needed for programming. Small models for linguistic work fine, but anything more sophisticated simply won't provide enough resources or power. Or models would need to be significantly dumbed down - then why use them at all? So far the idea of carrying a "thin" or "thin"-like device looks more reasonable to me, while running AI on your own server.

linguae 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I’m quite optimistic about the long-term future of local LLMs for privacy and cost control reasons. An LLM running on my own hardware, even if it’s not a laptop but a home server, is one where I don’t need to worry about token limits, token fees, privacy, and “rug-pulling” from the vendor.

In the short term, the big challenge is being able to afford hardware that can run a ~30B model. Last month I got to experiment with LLMs on a NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation as a visiting researcher during my summer break. I see the power of local LLMs for agentic coding; they’re no Claude, but they are quite useful. I wish I had gotten into local LLMs before hardware has gotten prohibitively expensive and in some cases unavailable; Apple discontinued certain Mac Minis and Mac Studios with high amounts of RAM due to the RAM shortage.

Hopefully high RAM prices don’t become a new normal, though the next year or two doesn’t look good.

brandon272 9 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> I don't understand the desire to run own AI models for programming locally.

Privacy. Security. Not bulk uploading your trade secrets and intellectual property to Sam and Dario’s servers.

OtherShrezzing 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> A model you can run on a loptop is simply not going to work as well as it's needed for programming

The models you can run on a high-spec laptop today are approximately where frontier models were 12-18mo ago (albeit at a lower tok/s rate). If you scan back through hn comments from that era, you’ll find plenty of people saying “this is powerful enough to massively increase my productivity”.

anon373839 an hour ago | parent [-]

> albeit at a lower tok/s rate

Not always! I get 80-100 tok/s from Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B on a MacBook Pro thanks to MTP. With long contexts that dips to around 50-60. However, prefill is much slower than API models. So it becomes really, really, really critical to not have cache misses.

ComputerPerson 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I've never done it but would be interested because it cuts out the burden of worrying about costs. Maybe I'm mistaken on energy cost here. There's a constant raincloud that follows me around regarding limits, and it would be nice to shake that.

I've been able to accomplish incredible feats (for myself) since GPT-4, so model intelligence is secondary.

lluisantoni 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

For some companies there might be a need to run them locally. For instance, Apple decided to run LLMs on the phone locally. I guess it depends on how important latency and privacy are. Perhaps Meta is looking at how much interest for those local models is there.

flaburgan 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Yet.