| ▲ | sparkling 3 hours ago |
| Even if you had a 64GB machine: Are you willing to reserve 90% of your memory to run a LLM? With dirt cheap models like deepseek-v4-flash that will run "forever" on $10, the answer for me is clearly: no. |
|
| ▲ | Manfrednotfunny 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| I'm waiting for the speed/quality per dollar metric to go down a little bit further and then I will def run it at home. Its not just that you send a sentence to an API endpoint, you always send EVERYTHING to that agent as a context. You want to analyse your spending history? You now send everything to someone. Either no one cares but understands this implication on how easy it is to really capture you or no one really things about it. But i'm a lot more diligent on what I send. I disabled the gemini activity feature for example because google started telling me that my stuff could be reviwed by humans. |
| |
| ▲ | plufz 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Yeah, it does feel a bit silly with my encrypted disks, encrypted backups, unique passwords, advanced router, etc, while I send everything I do in plain text to anthropic. | |
| ▲ | zbendefy 15 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | Similiarly I wonder why we dont run our own email server despite the sensitive data there. |
|
|
| ▲ | zoobab 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| "With dirt cheap models like deepseek-v4-flash that will run "forever" on $10, the answer for me is clearly: no." When it's free, you are the product. |
| |
| ▲ | IMTDb 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Deepseek flash is open weight, this means we can download and run that model without any connection to deepseek, no data/tokens/usage data ever reaches them. They cannot make us their product. | | |
| ▲ | Gigachad an hour ago | parent [-] | | All those random api providers are absolutely scooping up your data though. And the hardware to run it locally is absurdly expensive. |
| |
| ▲ | prplxd_nihilist 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I see many people saying deepseek and other chinese providers have always been profitable. Also they show their training costs publicly. Can't say for sure since I have not used it personally, but I think they'll for sure outlive the western SOTAs. | | |
| ▲ | LogicFailsMe an hour ago | parent [-] | | OpenAI apparently runs a profitable inference business with 40% gross margin, but their advertising budget is nutso and their real costs are pretraining and research. I suspect Deepseek's comp is not predicated on capturing the lightcone of all future value, some googling insinuates their top pay is $212K US which would support that suspicion. Compare and contrast with the $1.35M and up at OpenAI. |
| |
| ▲ | amrit3128 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Ah yes, I'm sure Trovalds and Stallman are harvesting my data through free software, aren't they? This argument is used by boomers who were fed cold war era propoganda that surely everybody is selfish, and you're always at fault. | | |
| ▲ | kipchak 12 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Think they're talking about things that are free as in beer but not free as in freedom, not FOSS |
|
|
|
| ▲ | halJordan 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| It's the size of a big vm. There's nothing wrong with reserving that much working space for one item. |