| ▲ | skinfaxi an hour ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
What point are you making? This hasn't been brought to court yet and I am lamenting the fact that charges have not been brought. > There is already precedent on more or less this exact scenario. Except you usually don't call people under your own jurisdiction "terrorists". That sort of term is reserved for people running those businesses in certain other places. By the way, it is an interesting feature of the American legal system that this sort of incident could spawn many proceedings, where a civil suit against the company in question could be one among many. I don't have a jurisdiction as I am not the judiciary nor law enforcement. I'm really not sure what you're driving at. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | godwinson__4-8 41 minutes ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
> I don't have a jurisdiction as I am not the judiciary nor law enforcement. I'm really not sure what you're driving at. If you were shot or a member of your family got "deleted" and you had sufficient control of the estate, then you would have standing. Obviously, if you aren't involved you shouldn't be able to sue and be compensated because something happened to someone else that doesn't relate to you at all. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||