>If you were shot or a member of your family got "deleted" and you had sufficient control of the estate, then you would have standing.

> Obviously, if you aren't involved you shouldn't be able to sue and be compensated because something happened to someone else that doesn't relate to you at all.

Crimes don't require standing wtf are you on about? Prosecutors bring charges not individuals.

▲

godwinson__4-8 an hour ago | parent [-]

> Prosecutors bring charges even if the estate doesn't pursue.

Simply wrong. In criminal cases, the government may not elect to bring charges for all sorts of reasons. The civil courts will still be available to you. That will be true whether there are charges or not. Whether that results in a conviction or not.

The government can also initiate a civil suit. Criminal charges against businesses are rare. I'm not sure any would apply here. Perhaps you'd like to volunteer a statute?

▲

skinfaxi an hour ago | parent [-]

> Prosecutors bring charges even if the estate doesn't pursue.

> Simply wrong.

You didn't refute my point :P

Wait so I only need to make a company and use AI to hack US banks and anyone else I want?

	▲	godwinson__4-8 30 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		You can try. You may want to read this first: https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/criminal-fraud/l... If you actually want an answer, that might be a good starting point. Or did you just want a cheap answer? Sam Altman paid off the president!! Are you happier now? Hope so. I don't blame you. I guess it's a bad time to be on the rule of law side when overt corruption exists. Then again, as mentioned, if the other parties affected actually wanted to, they could sue. Afaik they haven't done so. Seems unlikely even in "normal" times a criminal case would happen under these circumstances. I get that you are upset. But the rule of law should be respected. Even if we have to tolerate prosecutors handling cases differently than we would like. Have a nice day!