| ▲ | datakan a day ago |
| Really don't like all the drama around this. Should be dealt with in court, not tried in the press. Both sides should learn to remain silent and work the case through legal channels. |
|
| ▲ | VCFundedGenYer a day ago | parent | next [-] |
| Why are you both-sidesing this? Apple is doing it right, simple high level statements. OpenAI is acting like a teenager posting screenshots of literal texts and being overall petulant. This is open and shut. The mature company will win this. |
| |
| ▲ | JumpCrisscross 21 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | > Apple is doing it right, simple high level statements More to OP's points, Apple made legal filings. OpenAI is penning blog posts. | |
| ▲ | a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | [deleted] | |
| ▲ | solfox a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The lady doth protest too much, methinks | |
| ▲ | keeda 18 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > Apple is doing it right, simple high level statements. OpenAI is acting like a teenager posting screenshots of literal texts and being overall petulant. Or you know, another perspective: Apple filed a very public lawsuit with some very explosive allegations, and OpenAI responded with receipts showing some of those allegations to be rooted in Apple's own incompetence. Sure, many more allegations are still unaddressed, but based on these screenshots a neutral observer could realistically question those too. > This is open and shut. The mature company will win this. This is not OpenAI's first rodeo so we actually have precedent: Elon filed a similarly explosive lawsuit, OpenAI responded similarly with receipts, and guess who won that case: https://openai.com/index/openai-elon-musk/ | |
| ▲ | lightedman a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | "Apple is doing it right, simple high level statements." Apple does this to most any company that ends up with any of its former employees. It's basically expected. Apple is being the bully. | |
| ▲ | tjwebbnorfolk a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Looking at things from multiple perspectives and trying to see validity in each point of view is a virtue, not a vice. I really hate that "both-sides" has become a copy-paste insult by ideologues. | | |
| ▲ | crazygringo 21 hours ago | parent [-] | | It's a virtue when there is validity to both sides. But it's extremely harmful when there isn't. "Alice says murder is bad, while Bob says murder is a fun and healthy recreational activity. Trying to see validity in each point of view is a virtue, not a vice." See, it doesn't work. | | |
| ▲ | tjwebbnorfolk 21 hours ago | parent [-] | | The point is you need to TRY in order to have a chance of finding validity. No one is talking about murder here, which a pretty trite counterexample. In the case of Apple and OpenAI, since that's actually what we're talking about: why is it wrong to suggest that there may be validity to each other's points of view, especially given that we don't have all the facts? |
|
| |
| ▲ | liamgm a day ago | parent | prev [-] | | Nah , OpenAI doing it right , defending its interest and valuable employee with both legal and public from competing company negative oppinion. |
|
|
| ▲ | eagerpace a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| This, and the books, and the government contracts, and the distillation… It’s like that one friend who complains how drama always finds them and they are clueless why. |
|
| ▲ | nrmitchi a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| "If you have the facts on your side, pound the facts; if you have the law on your side, pound the law; if you have neither, pound the table." It's 2026; we can probably update "pound the table" to "pound social media" |
|
| ▲ | devsda a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The whole affair and the blog post feels like proxy signal to potential investors from OpenAI that they have now developed/acquired tech that is worth enough to grab Apple's attention ? |
|
| ▲ | madeofpalk a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I mean, they are dealing with it in the courts, right? This is the press picking up on public court filings https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/73602437/49/apple-inc-v... |
|
| ▲ | 6gvONxR4sf7o a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Seems to be Altman's playbook, just like how he got the CEO job back. |
| |
|
| ▲ | sublinear a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| It's OpenAI still trying to maintain control of the narrative while they burn to the ground. For years they haven't really delivered while bullying anyone who doesn't have an "AI strategy". The media is happy to stoke the flames. |
|
| ▲ | georgemcbay a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > Both sides should learn to remain silent and work the case through legal channels. This isn't a "both sides" situation. OpenAI is posting drama blog posts. Apple isn't doing that. "Apple says" in the headline here actually means: Apple filed for a preliminary injunction with the court and since that is a public record we are reporting the contents of it. |
|
| ▲ | a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| [deleted] |
|
| ▲ | freejazz a day ago | parent | prev [-] |
| >Both sides should learn to remain silent and work the case through legal channels. Why? Apple surely doesn't want to and why should they? |
| |
| ▲ | thewebguyd a day ago | parent [-] | | Huh? Apple is literally working through legal channels, the article is pulled from the court filings which are public record. OpenAI is the one making blog posts. |
|
