Looking at things from multiple perspectives and trying to see validity in each point of view is a virtue, not a vice. I really hate that "both-sides" has become a copy-paste insult by ideologues.

▲

crazygringo 21 hours ago | parent [-]

It's a virtue when there is validity to both sides.

But it's extremely harmful when there isn't.

"Alice says murder is bad, while Bob says murder is a fun and healthy recreational activity. Trying to see validity in each point of view is a virtue, not a vice." See, it doesn't work.

	▲	tjwebbnorfolk 21 hours ago \| parent [-]
		The point is you need to TRY in order to have a chance of finding validity. No one is talking about murder here, which a pretty trite counterexample. In the case of Apple and OpenAI, since that's actually what we're talking about: why is it wrong to suggest that there may be validity to each other's points of view, especially given that we don't have all the facts?