Remix.run Logo
rawgabbit 13 hours ago

I don’t think he was targeted but he met the reality of bureaucracy. One agency actually funded him and approved the building and allowed him to operate for 11 years. Another agency said you can’t operate or sell because of the growing mold. Another agency said dump the forbidden fish sauce in the sewer. Another agency said to bury it.

busterarm 12 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Canadian bureaucracy around food is at times insane (and vaguely racist). Just look up '1985 Jamaican patty wars'.

gruez 12 hours ago | parent [-]

From cbc:

>In 1985, the Canadian government tried to stop Jamaican bakeries and restaurants from using the term "beef patty."

>At the time, Canada's Meat Inspection Act classified a beef patty as what goes in a hamburger. It could contain only meat and seasoning and it couldn't be encased in dough or a crust. Therefore, a Jamaican patty — widely known as a flaky pastry with a spiced beef filling — didn't meet the criteria.

That actually vaguely seems reasonable? Especially in contexts where there's only text to go by (eg. on a menu), people might actually be confused.

jjmarr 12 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Having grown up in Toronto, unqualified "beef patty" means the Jamaican snack. It is extremely common junk food I would buy at a convenience store on my way home from school.

MisterTea an hour ago | parent | next [-]

Going to school in Jamaica, Queens (ironic, I know) I would get a beef patty from a deli/bodega on a roll with cheese or on cocoa bread (said to be the only way to eat it by random dude hanging out in store who called my cheese order blasphemy) Another specialty is pizza shops carry them and you can get one split open, covered in mozzarella and topped with pepperoni. You'd never think you'd get them in an Italian eatery but there you have it, beef patties. I still get fresh Tower Aisle beef patties from the local C-Town deli from time to time.

dataflow 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Not being from Toronto, never in a million years would I even think of that as a visitor.

gomoboo 11 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I grew up in another country where Jamaican patties were popular and ordering a 'beef patty' would never get you a burger patty unless you were in a burger joint. Same as in Toronto; asking for patty (or beef patty) will 99% of the time get you a Jamaican patty.

gruez 10 hours ago | parent [-]

>>Not being from Toronto, never in a million years would I even think of that as a visitor.

>I grew up in another country where Jamaican patties were popular [...]

Have you considered the possibility that Jamaican patties aren't universally popular and the fact that the two of you came from cities with a significant Jamaican diaspora doesn't invalidate the experience of the person who probably came from a city that didn't?

arjie 40 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

All of that may be true and yet it seems overly prescriptive for a state authority to determine the name of food. After all, a cheesesteak is not a steak but a sandwich. Regional variations on names are quite reasonable. On the other hand, Canadians are a prescriptive culture. In Montreal, for instance, they are very strict about street signs and so on. Perhaps it is just how things are done by that people.

beedeebeedee 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I’m from New Haven and if you went into a place and asked for a beef patty you would get a Jamaican beef patty, not a burger. It may not be everywhere, but pretty much every city I’ve lived in that is the case

cwillu an hour ago | parent [-]

If you ask for a beef patty here, the server will look confused, and then bring you a hamburger patty on a plate

8 hours ago | parent | prev [-]
[deleted]
overfeed 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

How many visitors do you think would go to a restaurant intending to order a (hamburger) beef patty? The potential for confusion is overstated.

xp84 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I think that type of law is usually supposed to protect against, not a surprised restaurant patron (because that's the kind of thing that would fix itself anyway, the customer would send it back and/or not go back) but subtle adulteration of food.

The law says the "patty" has to be nothing but meat and seasoning so that nobody can sell a "beef patty" that looks like a normal patty but actually is 10% sawdust (or more plausibly, some gross but very cheap filler product).

In a well-functioning government, this kind of thing could be worked out - the regulators would realize their rules were too far-reaching and culturally myopic, and that this is clearly not an attempt to sneak adulterated mystery meat past them. They could alter the regulation, like allowing the term "Jamaican Beef Patty" to be used, and that prefix removes the 'no encasement' regulation and allows whatever other common safe ingredients.

But of course, most governments don't function that well. The bureaucrats get deeply invested in enforcing their rules and no one with the authority to change the regulation can even hear the cries of those impacted, let alone change them.

gruez 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

That's not too remote of a possibility given that street foods like currywurst exist, and sausages are theoretically supposed to be sold encased in bread (ie. hot dog) similar to beef patties.

6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]
[deleted]
roncesvalles 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Sorry, but you're just uncultured if you don't know what Jamaican patties are.

This is like saying "never in a million years would I think 'butter chicken' is a red, spicy Indian curry instead of chicken roasted in butter".

dataflow an hour ago | parent | next [-]

Usually, when I travel, it helps me to better understand and respect that other people may have different perspectives or experiences than me. This is probably the first time I'm seeing someone so cultured achieve the exact opposite, so thanks for familiarizing me with that.

P.S. When I search "what is a beef patty" on Google it quotes and links me to Wikipedia [1] which says absolutely nothing about Jamaica. Perhaps consider enlightening Wikipedia if you'd like to make the world a more cultured place.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patty

UqWBcuFx6NV4r 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Sorry, you’re just uncultured if you don’t understand that understandings of different “foreign” cultures differ from place to place.

I don’t even agree that the use of the term “beef patty” should be regulated just so you don’t confuse a dumb tourist lol. Getting something you didn’t expect is part of travelling. But YOUR comment is too condescending and hypocritical to NOT draw attention to, and it’s a type of hypocrisy that’s endemic to North America. You tell someone from the US that you don’t know Spanish or some aspect of Mexican culture or something like that and if they’re snooty enough they’ll call you an uncultured trailer park hick or something. Put another 1,000–2,000 km of distance to the cultural reference you’re making and you’ll get blank stares.

I live in a country that’s far further from the Caribbean, where it makes up an insignificant part of our vast multicultural landscape. Don’t act like I’m “uncultured” due to something that you’re much more likely to know about due to your geographic proximity.

roncesvalles 3 hours ago | parent [-]

1. Jamaican cuisine is fairly popular globally.

2. Patties are popular within Jamaican cuisine.

It's not something very niche. I think my comment was perfectly fair. It's like not knowing what empanadas, samosas, shumai, or takoyaki are (and yes, one would be uncultured for not knowing any of these too). It betrays something about the cosmopolitan-ness of your life experiences.

It's not even about geography. I'm pretty sure a good proportion of even Torontonians don't know about the Jamaican patty, and I'd call them uncultured too.

There's nothing wrong about being uncultured, it's not the end of the world. You can even work to improve it.

elros 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

If we're going by anecdotes, let's add mine: I've lived in 4 continents, about 15 countries, I speak 6 languages, I hold a few citizenships, I consider myself fairly cultured and not only I've never eaten a Jamaican meat patty but I've also never seen one for sale.

In fact the only way I know about their existence is through watching news reports of what happened in Canada in 1985.

How familiar are you with food from the Amazon basin region? I wouldn't consider you uncultured for not knowing much about it, but orders of magnitude more people eat food from the Amazon basin than Jamaican food.

roncesvalles 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

>In fact the only way I know about their existence is through watching news reports of what happened in Canada in 1985.

Since you know about it, the label doesn't apply to you, regardless of how.

elros 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Alright, buddy :-)

elros 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

That being said I'll gladly accept Jamaican restaurant recommendations in Taiwan or close to Berlin.

xp84 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Obligatory https://xkcd.com/2501/

"The average North American probably only knows about Ackee and Saltfish, and Curry Goat!"

"And Oxtail Stew, of course."

"Of course!"

Does one need to know a variety of dishes from each of the 193 UN-recognized states' cuisines to not be uncultured? If not, which ones are OK to be ignorant of? Clearly Jamaica's a must-have, but I'd like the full list so I can remediate the issue at once.

roncesvalles 2 hours ago | parent [-]

>Does one need to know a variety of dishes from each of the 193 UN-recognized states' cuisines to not be uncultured?

No, but you should know the top 5 dishes of the 10-15 most popular cuisines of the world, at least. That's only about 50-75 dishes; many individual restaurants have bigger menus than that.

>Ackee and Saltfish, and Curry Goat! And Oxtail Stew,

Yes... I would expect one to know these. At least that oxtail stew is a popular Jamaican delicacy.

_carbyau_ 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> No, but you should know the top 5 dishes of the 10-15 most popular cuisines of the world, at least. That's only about 50-75 dishes; many individual restaurants have bigger menus than that.

Man, I so don't care about food. I pay attention to it enough that it doesn't hurt me and gives me the nutrients I need.

193? Top five? 10-15? 50-75? I could not care less to have a standard regarding knowledge about cuisines.

I get what food I can from the options I have available to me and use the words on the menu or out of the staff's mouth.

Edit: stick to the point

xp84 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

You’re asserting that Jamaican is in the top 15?

That’s quite the claim.

legastenigga 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[dead]

mc3301 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Same in Edmonton, the other side of Canada.

anigbrowl 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Any confusion can easily be resolved by asking the person offering to sell you one what it is. I do not need terminological rules between me and fast food vendors; if I buy a 'muffin hot dog parfait' and it turns out not to be the tasty dish I was expecting, I may complain about it but I have the choice to just not go there again.

I support the idea of truth in advertising laws but I think they should be limited to factual claims. Courts shouldn't entertain lawsuits over such silly things either.

stickfigure 9 hours ago | parent [-]

I am shocked to learn there is no dog in a hot dog. Calling my lawyer...

inigyou 4 hours ago | parent [-]

In Germany if they applied the laws consistently it would actually be illegal to call it a hot dog if it wasn't dog. Supermarket had to rename "chilli beans" to "kidney beans in chilli sauce" because there's no bean species called a chilli bean

inigyou 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Did you know in Germany it's illegal to call a product "soy yoghurt" because yoghurt is a dairy product?

jhbadger 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Wisconsin ("America's dairyland" according to the motto, although other states produce more these days) tries occasionally to introduce bills to prevent non-dairy beverages labeling themselves "milk" in the state on the grounds that it's misleading. I always wonder if they succeed, will peanut butter be next on their radar?

xp84 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Here in America it’s the same - the people selling the fake stuff (sorry, “plant based stuff”) get around it by using fanciful spellings, that’s why we have “Cheez” and “OatMylk” and stuff. Also a VERY popular one: “Crème” - sounds fancy and French!! McDonalds offers a “Strawberries & Crème Pie.”

EA-3167 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Specificity and rules in German bureaucracy? A real shock, let me tell you.

inigyou 3 hours ago | parent [-]

As a result of this, half the stuff in a German supermarket doesn't say what it is on the packaging, just the brand name. So soy yoghurt doesn't say soy yoghurt, it says Alpro and you just have to guess or interpret the fine print to know that it's soy yoghurt.

Even actual yoghurt can't say yoghurt. It has to say mild yoghurt, on some technicality.

dmix 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Second order effects of well intentioned regulation. As is tradition.

EA-3167 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

That sounds like industry lobbying got the better of them, we have similar fights going on here around calling things plant "milk" or "butter" and the rest. What a shame, I can't imagine it's a lot of fun having to forensically examine every item on the shelf.

8note 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

it is impossible in canada to sell swedish meatballs - cant have the onion or breadcrumbs

SECProto 8 hours ago | parent [-]

> it is impossible in canada to sell swedish meatballs - cant have the onion or breadcrumbs

I don't know if that's just an attempt at humour, but it doesn't feel like it, so I'll correct you: that's factually incorrect, you can buy them commonly.

https://www.realcanadiansuperstore.ca/en/swedish-beef-meatba...

https://www.compliments.ca/en/products/meatballs-swedish-680...

imajoredinecon 12 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

It’s not that it’s unreasonable to think the word “patty” is ambiguous —it’s that it’s unreasonable to spend tax dollars on saving people from that ambiguity

SECProto 12 hours ago | parent [-]

> it’s unreasonable to spend tax dollars on saving people from that ambiguity

I quite appreciate the taxpayer funded regulation of technical terms - I like being able to buy ice cream at the store and know if it's "ice cream" or "frozen dessert". Or "cream cheese" vs "cream cheese product". Or many other similar things.

The Jamaican patty and fish sauce ones are problematic, but also happened 25-40 years ago.

hn773746483 an hour ago | parent | next [-]

In Ontario, "Frozen Treat" and "Ice Cream", "Orange Juice" and "Orange Drink" are on shelves often right beside eachother with nearly identical packaging. I only noticed the latter when I saw one was significantly cheaper, at first thought it was pulp/no pulp.

jstanley 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Do you have an encyclopedic knowledge of which terms are regulated and which ones aren't?

Don't you think it would cause more confusion if people expecting to buy a Jamaican beef patty instead have to buy a "Jamaican beef-inside-pastry product" ?

gruez 11 hours ago | parent [-]

>Do you have an encyclopedic knowledge of which terms are regulated and which ones aren't?

Do you have an encyclopedic knowledge of which professions are regulated and which aren't? If not, should we get rid of professional licensing?

>Don't you think it would cause more confusion if people expecting to buy a Jamaican beef patty instead have to buy a "Jamaican beef-inside-pastry product" ?

This feels like a strawman given that they settled on "Jamaican patty", which is reasonably brief and certainly less confusing than the original term of just "beef patty".

snapplebobapple 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Choose one of the bureaucracies and shut it down. It doesnt even matter which one you choose, it will be a better outcome

inigyou 4 hours ago | parent [-]

I choose the EPA.