Remix.run Logo
Remix clone Hacker News
new | show | ask | jobsGithub
▲ pg83 5 hours ago

I assure you, this is a very professionally made product:

- we have 5,000 tests covering all aspects of terminal behavior

- we have address sanitizer and ub sanitizer runs of these tests

- we also have regular fuzzing!

- we even monitor code coverage

This is definitely a top 0.1% GitHub project in terms of development approach.

> and neither will it help with getting it installed on corporate networks.

I'm fine with it.

▲mellosouls 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I assure you, this is a very professionally made product

The moronic naming immediately undermines that claim.

See my other comment [1] that acknowledges the effort is presumably there, which is why the childishness is frustrating.

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49150227

▲pg83 4 hours ago | parent [-]

> The moronic naming immediately undermines that claim.

It's quite obvious to me that professionalism in product manufacturing correlates very weakly with naming :) Proof me wrong.

▲naikrovek 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Nothing else on any market called “shitty” that I’ve ever seen, and if I had, I would avoid it.

Any sales or marketing person will gladly tell you how bad an idea it is to use this name. “Shitty” is slang for “terrible quality”, for one.

▲gertop an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> This is definitely a top 0.1% GitHub project in terms of development approach.

Shitty is almost 100% generated by AI, tests and all. Is that really what you see as the epitome of development? Enough that you self rank in top 0.3%?

▲naikrovek 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

How much of it was written by AI?

▲pg83 4 hours ago | parent [-]

If we are talking about the process of direct code production according to a given specification, then 100%.

▲EPWN3D 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

lol fuck this guy, the name and branding are awesome dude