| ▲ | neom 4 hours ago |
| There is a woman on twitter who makes seedance videos of her and Dario from anthropic, they're kinda weird but generally pretty high quality: https://x.com/CuiMao/status/2058458683781365873 (full collection: https://x.com/CuiMao/status/2082740754380984373) - seeing them was the first time I'd been impressed with AI video gen. |
|
| ▲ | throwatdem12311 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| This is deeply disturbing…for so…so so many reasons. |
| |
|
| ▲ | sumedh 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I dont normally like AI videos but this was just amazing, by next year the tech will be perfect, cheaper, we are going to AI videos everywhere whether anyone likes it or not. |
| |
| ▲ | deadbabe 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | people like it. Maybe not older generations, but we're about to get a fresh new generation of people that will not have a lifetime of experience looking at human generated content, and so have no real bias against AI content. And then every generation after that will be born into increasingly a AI-video rich world. | | |
| ▲ | weird-eye-issue 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | The older generation loves them the most. Sometimes my mom sends me several AI generated reels in one day and she doesn't care if it's AI or not she just finds them funny. | |
| ▲ | ElProlactin an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > And then every generation after that will be born into increasingly a AI-video rich world. So 2-3 generations if we're lucky. | | |
| ▲ | schleck8 2 minutes ago | parent [-] | | 5 years. Most people do not care where what they consume originates (out of sight, out of mind) as long as it's highly personalized and abundant |
| |
| ▲ | ipsum2 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Older generations absolutely love AI slop. If you haven't used Facebook recently, it's all old people sharing fake videos of animals doing silly things. | |
| ▲ | kwanbix 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Sad. Wish there was a huge library of human generated content they can look at. | |
| ▲ | weitendorf 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Right now we're going through multiple concurrent but slightly non-overlapping transitions where AI is almost good enough for something, and seeing a predictable surge of spam/bad quality crap people don't like, followed by a whiplash effect when it reaches human or superhuman levels of performance. I think most developers would agree that the Cursor vibe-code era sentiment towards AI for coding was right in the sense that it wasn't that useful then, and a lot of people did and do stupid things with it, but it really did deliver quite substantially on its promise just a couple years after the "consensus" was often "that's never going to work". It's very strange to me how consistently public opinion shifts on this problem. In the long run we're all dead but whether it takes one or five years, you probably will be there to live through it. I assume whoever is downvoting you is just thinking with their consumer-brain or "I don't want that" (the way it is now) rather than that this will be no different than video games, or wasn't a child who watched youtubepoop or other weird stuff because it was funny. | |
| ▲ | daveguy 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Nah. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | weitendorf 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| People are still figuring out the social norms surrounding "deepfakes" and I'm convinced there are some versions of the future where it becomes normalized for content under essentially fair use/free speech doctrine, and many where it's used to restrict free speech in the small number of jurisdictions where public figures would currently be allowed to be featured in this content. Obviously there are a lot of ways it shouldn't be used but I want to live in the future where it's something we use to have fun, where reasonable, rather than a dangerous/sketchy taboo |
|
| ▲ | wenc 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| That is absolutely hilarious. Dario Amodei, a romcom lead. |
|
| ▲ | noisy_boy 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I can't make up my mind if the simplistic narrative typical of Chinese romcom shorts is more funny or more weird. |
|
| ▲ | cortesoft 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The scene that says “Stanford University” looks a lot like UCLA. |
| |
| ▲ | jedbrooke 8 minutes ago | parent [-] | | UCLA is often used as a stand in for many colleges in movie sets (notably Harvard, as one of the buildings in UCLA has the Harvard crest on it specifically for this purpose) due to its proximity to Hollywood. It likely ended up in the training data that way | | |
| ▲ | cortesoft 2 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Yep, I notice it all the time in movies and tv shows. They were filming the movie "Old School" my freshman year there, I thought it was so cool. Makes sense it is in a lot of the training data |
|
|
|
| ▲ | brotchie 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| I guess the orange sphincter is really a flower… |
