| ▲ | inigyou 21 hours ago |
| I don't think we want telcos to block scam calls themselves. We want them to be forced to give the subscriber's actual address to the police. |
|
| ▲ | dredmorbius 16 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Why not? And why would you impose a highly-intrusive personal-tracking system across billions of subscribers? |
| |
| ▲ | inigyou 12 hours ago | parent [-] | | Because I don't want some stupid AI system to randomly decide I'm a spam caller. And you know every other country has full KYC for phone connections, right? | | |
| ▲ | dredmorbius 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | What would be a sufficient appeals process or remedy action that might address your concern? What activities are you engaged in which make you think you'd likely be considered a spammer? What specific harms do you see occurring? Might these be related to your present line of business / profession / employment? | | |
| ▲ | inigyou 6 hours ago | parent [-] | | Sure, if someone gave me a false phone number to call them on, I could be declared a spammer. If I had to call more than 3 people a day ordinarily, I could be declared a spammer. I'm basing these on what already happens in the banking sector as a direct result of the regulation you want. | | |
| ▲ | dredmorbius 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | What would be a sufficient appeals process or remedy action that might address your concern? What activities are you engaged in which make you think you'd likely be considered a spammer? What specific harms do you see occurring? Might these be related to your present line of business / profession / employment? | | |
| ▲ | inigyou 20 minutes ago | parent [-] | | You have just copy-pasted your previous comment. That is a form of spam, and I'm flagging it as such. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | etchalon 15 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| They don't to block scam calls. They can easily limit who gets access to make them, making the resource itself precious enough no one would risk wasting it on a dial scam. |
