| ▲ | glitchc 2 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
FIFA made $~15 billion USD this World Cup, roughly double what they made in Qatar in 2022. There are many low-hanging fruit that can be optimized to increase that revenue by 10x. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | overfeed 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
I didn't realize the commercial-block-sized "hydration breaks" were that profitable. For a second, I thought the Americanization[1] of fùtbol would be done gradually and no one would complain as we'd be slowly boiled. I'm glad the corrupt bastards got greedy/impatient and took a big swing. 1. Sports primarily as a business, catering to owners first, sponsors second, broadcasters third, and then lastly, fans. IMO non-profit sports organizations are the best model for fans, who I identify the most with. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | haunter 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
The difference that FIFA ran the whole tournament now. There was no Local Organizing Committee (LOC) like with every single previous event. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | lossolo an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
> There are many low-hanging fruit that can be optimized to increase that revenue by 10x. The $15 billion figure is for FIFA's ENTIRE 2023-2026 revenue cycle, so not just this World Cup. But the obvious "low-hanging fruit" was making the tournamenta lot larger (104 matches instead of Qatar's 64), so a lot more tickets, hospitality sales, ads etc Also two 3 minute hydration breaks per match, giving broadcasters additional advertising windows. That's your "optimization". | |||||||||||||||||