Remix.run Logo
pavel_lishin 4 hours ago

> generic TV boxes that promise unlimited content streaming for a one-time fee

I don't want to blame the purchasers of these things - who are some of the victims - but at the same time, it does seem like a Too Good To Be True situation.

havaloc 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I have an elderly client who sends me links of stuff to buy all the time. One day it's one of these streaming sticks, the next day it's half-price stamps, and I tell her every time, please don't buy this stuff. And yet she does anyway, as if I was almost being mean and saying no just to say no.

So yes, I do want to blame the purchasers of these things, sometimes. To prove her point that her stamps were legitimate, she mailed me a card using one of her half priced (but likely fake) stamps and it made it through!

Terr_ 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Perhaps they grew up in a time/environment where "if it was that bad they wouldn't be allowed to advertise it", and they're still using that old calibration?

mhurron 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

My falther-in-law was less that and more, if I can get away with it, it's actually legal. Many know their fake, and do it because they can get away with it.

That was his justification for a satellite descrambler, they're sending me the signals, obviously I'm allowed to.

mmooss 17 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

I can imagine many on HN having excited discussions about their satellite descramblers.

> do it because they can get away with it.

Lots of people on HN download and upload copyrighted materials. Is it really different?

brewdad 10 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

There's an old Carlin joke about "If a cop didn't see it, I didn't do it."

iamben an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I think that's a default for a lot of the older (and some of the younger!) generation, same goes for news and media. They grew up in a time where there was a practical barrier to publishing and (largely) laws behind you doing it.

So they trust literally everything they read. I still don't think my folks can fathom you can spin up a very real looking newspaper website with fake articles in about 10 minutes.

mmooss 16 minutes ago | parent [-]

I find younger people are more likely to trust whatever they read - social media rumors, LLM output, Reddit threads - and older people looking for credible sources.

brewdad 5 minutes ago | parent [-]

When my kid was young I set up a basic web server and taught him how to make a VERY basic web page. I let him write whatever nonsense he wanted to and then we made it live.

It was both a gateway into learning how the web works but also that literally anyone can post anything to the internet and it doesn't make it true. I like to think he's more savvy than many of his peers but we all have our blind spots.

Pxtl 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Of course, what they're missing is that laws are for poor people.

Amazon will be notified they sold something illegal and will take it down and ban the seller who will immediately launch a new store under a new name.

The purchaser, on the other hand, will be fully liable for whatever horrible thing they bought.

an hour ago | parent [-]
[deleted]
floam an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Half priced stamps work though, and nobody is going to prosecute grandma for counterfeiting postage stamps.

zeafoamrun an hour ago | parent [-]

Yes they do. USPIS does not f around

Pxtl 38 minutes ago | parent [-]

Oddly they don't ever seem to prosecute the sites that profit from selling them. Funny, that.

kube-system 16 minutes ago | parent [-]

Makes sense to me, the only place I've ever seen them personally advertised are overseas websites.

Scroll_Swe 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Then again I used to torrent everything under the sun and it actually rocks to have every tv show, movie, game ever released for free forever.

So is it greed? Yes, but I did it too so now that its more accessible I cannot really blame people.

pibaker 9 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> it does seem like a Too Good To Be True situation

It's difficult to judge the price of media products. We have legal music streaming services that charges you an album's worth of money a month and lets you listen to millions of songs. You can pick up old AAA games for less than ten bucks. I'd say when people say that price tag, they don't think they get scammed into being a part of a botnet. They think the device manufacturer cut a good deal with the media rights holders.

nvme0n1p1 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

OTOH - TV, radio, and YouTube are all unlimited and free. Why not streaming?

There are lots of people alive who grew up during the days of broadcast TV and radio. I get why they might not understand the difference.

weberer 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

There are a ton of legitimately free IPTV streams. You can watch them through most media players like VLC without having to download anything shady.

https://github.com/iptv-org/iptv

nvme0n1p1 41 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

Ok but have fun explaining that to the average person. Buying a dongle is easier than installing software or typing URLs into their TV ("my TV doesn't even have a keyboard").

To most people IPTV is a bunch of gibberish letters, indistinguishable from the gibberish brands on Amazon. Someone's grandma from Colorado doesn't deserve to get scammed because she didn't research the acronyms.

kube-system 9 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-]

That is chock-full of pirated content.

nuxi an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

Two things:

- How are these "legitimately free"? For example AMC is a commercial TV channel and as far as I know, they don't offer free streaming. Same goes for MGM, FilmBox etc.

- Strictly speaking this isn't IPTV, it's just web streams. IPTV is usually delivered via multicast (MPEG-TS/RTP/RTSP streams, over UDP mostly).

25 minutes ago | parent [-]
[deleted]
bluedino an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

Most people who buy these want to watch free movies, sports streams, etc that aren't on OTA or free services

paultopia an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Yeah, isn’t this a classic kind of scam the would-be scammer situation? If you think there’s some way to buy one cheap device and somehow get around subscribing to streaming services[1], then of course you’re going to be in a market with fraudsters…

[1] Can someone explain what the theory of the product is here? It sounds like they’re marketing these things as ways for the customer to commit fraud, for example by connecting to someone else’s login. How else would the customer expect to be able to get free Netflix or whatever?

iugtmkbdfil834 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Uhh, I have an extended family member, who not only uses it, but now also tries to get other people to get into it. Since I was familiar with this practice ( and the issues it makes worse ), I noted those to him in an attempt to both politely decline and, hopefully, spare him, and society, some future problems. Without going into any identifying details, he didn't take it well ( and I don't think I got on my high horse ).

Anyway, I think some level of blame is warranted.

rng-concern an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I know a few people who buy these, and they kind of know what they're doing. They just try and not think about it too hard.

It reminds me of the saying: "It Is Difficult to Get a Man to Understand Something When His Salary Depends Upon His Not Understanding It".

If these people thought about it for a few minutes, they would understand, but they choose not to, as ignoring it is too advantageous.

I admit I was tempted, as the price of all streaming services goes up, and services become more and more fragmented. During the same period where I have not had a raise.

acdha 10 minutes ago | parent [-]

In the 90s, there was a cottage industry selling CDs of bootleg software at swap meets and flea markets. A guy my dad knew was almost condescending to anyone who paid for software despite having been hit by viruses multiple times because it was so much cheaper. Even having to deal with a client(!) who naively called the vendor support only to be informed that they hadn’t actually purchased a license wasn’t enough to get him to resist that savings.

varispeed an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I used to know someone doing this. They said they know it is too good to be true, but they hate corporations and it's their little way to stick one in.

IncreasePosts 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Maybe, but if they're a not-very-tech savvy older person buying this, they probably remember shows being free from over the air antennas and may think it is something like that.

ghostly_s 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> they probably remember shows being free from over the air antennas

you are aware broadcast TV never ended?

IncreasePosts 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Yes, in fact I have an antenna and a HDHomeRun nestled in my attic to record over the air shows that I occasionally consume.

But, I think it's far more common for people to have a TV service today, perhaps since comcast and their ilk push hard the TV/phone/internet bundle, and gone are the years when everyone would fiddle with the antennas on the back of their TV to get the right reception.

bdangubic 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I watch TV over an antenna, shows are free still

an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
fred_is_fred 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

If you offered most people free streaming for a $37 USB stick but directly told them it would be faking ad clicks when the TV is off, would any of them really care?

ajnin 31 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

Maybe they wouldn't care about the ads but the residential proxy is another story. I'm sure lots of problematic stuff goes through that and you take the risk of being associated with it.

1970-01-01 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

No, and that's is the root of the problem. The buyer is happy and so is the seller. They don't care to understand what they're allowing and everyone is allowing it to happen.

bayarearefugee an hour ago | parent | next [-]

I wouldn't use a device like this for a lot of reasons, but the fact that what they are doing might be taking advantage of the incredibly predatory digital advertising system is neutral to positive for me, if I'm being fully honest.

If they were using the system to rip off random people, I'd be 100% against it, if they are fucking Google and the giant corps that advertise with them, ehh.. not my problem and can't be assed to care. Google is not a positive force in the world. Hasn't been for many years.

mschild an hour ago | parent [-]

Wouldn't this ultimately make money FOR Google and only cost money to the company that placed the ad?

Sure, Google's paying but they get their money regardless.

chowells 23 minutes ago | parent [-]

It might damage Google's reputation with advertisers in the long term. I'm not convinced Google would even care about it, given their other behavior.

GolfPopper 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

They're just meeting the standards American society has set.

Scroll_Swe 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Ah yes there was no rampant piracy in eastern europe during/after Soviet lmao

Tankies like this make me laugh

dang 12 minutes ago | parent [-]

Could you please stop posting unsubstantive comments and flamebait, and also please stop using HN primarily for political/ideological battle?

These things are not what HN is for, and destroy what it is for, so we ban accounts that do them repeatedly.

If you'd please review https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and stick to the rules when posting here, we'd appreciate it.

croes 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It sounds like scam

flerchin 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Well now I want one

Cider9986 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Stremio+TorBox are the two words. ($3/month)

ghostly_s 3 hours ago | parent [-]

That's not what these things are. They come preloaded with apps that stream pirate broadcast streams and on-demand servers operated out of China.

Cider9986 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

It could be possible, I haven't done the math though.

Stremio +Torbox is $3/month and they can probably share 10+ households on one TorBox account so it could work out. The seller could just stop paying the TorBox subscription at whatever point and they have an incentive to do so.