This doesn't really happen by accident, especially where it's significant enough to constitute copyright infringement. And to my knowledge, there hasn't been a single lawsuit over this in the entire history of LLM-assisted coding.

▲

dijksterhuis 9 hours ago | parent [-]

> there hasn't been a single lawsuit over this in the entire history of LLM-assisted coding.

the "entire history of" is circa 3-4 years, which is very much a tiny period of time compared to normal legal system / copyright law stuff (IANAL).

▲

olalonde 9 hours ago | parent [-]

It's enough to tell you that, if it does happen, it must be quite rare and not a widespread systemic issue. It's also worth noting that Anthropic and co are so confident that it's a non-issue that they offer full copyright indemnification to their commercial users.

▲

dijksterhuis 8 hours ago | parent [-]

> It's enough to tell you that, if it does happen, it must be quite rare and not a systematic issue.

alternative perspective: it's just taking time for the lawyers to figure out what they can sue them for.

	▲	olalonde 8 hours ago \| parent [-]
		Not sure I understand. If some company or open source project is violating your copyright, you sue them for copyright infringement, no?