while I totally understand the risk of foreign hardware and firmware, this is exclusively a sabotage of green power development confirmed by the methodology and speed of implementation of it.

blocking related projects by forcing a supply chain re-co figuration and disconnect from grid for non compliancy it's a clear targeted sabotage and does not mitigate the risk! -> us produced inverter with asian chips and firmware anyway!

this is only devolution and it can happen only there, especially WITHOUT a clear transition or migration plan that considers hardware, industry and infrastructure!

if more power is needed, and power costs are increasing, why force disconnect and sabotage development for green power? dont forget to do 1+1 with the reality of your state dear citizens!

▲

lazide a day ago | parent [-]

Counterpoint - building out even more critical infrastructure which might as well be coming pre-rootkitted by a known foreign adversary seems quite dumb?

▲

giov4 a day ago | parent | next [-]

nope, that's the defacto standard for the past 30 years and I was against it for security reasons, it was not dumb it was convenient in times of peace for many!

so I agree if my country would produce and enforce usage of country developed inverters with a correct and ramp up plan to reach that.

but hard cutting it without having the infrastructure and market ready to compensate that is just full "rword"ness.

and then there will be still parts of boards and chips coming anyway from external suppliers and being "fake" ?

what about the real crit infra beside solar and wind? what about the supply chain there? fully localized? 3rd party and 4th party fully audited?

is just a joke

▲

cyanydeez 21 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

there's no evidence for the countpoint; so it's mostly counterparanoia.

▲

voakbasda 18 hours ago | parent [-]

There is a ton of evidence that equipment out of China can come with built-in backdoors and worse.

▲

cyanydeez 18 hours ago | parent [-]

at best, theres evidence of the same guilty poorly built software and hardware because capitalism is king

king, youre angry at capitalism not some super uber foreign suveillance program.

its like being angry that someone entered your house cause you bought a cheap door and its lock broke.

▲

lazide 17 hours ago | parent [-]

I have it on good authority that the Soviets also made crap.

▲

cyanydeez 11 hours ago | parent [-]

yes, but we're talking about how the Chinese produce crap that's built cheaply, sold cheaply, ends up in American's hands and it's buggy and insecure; and instead of thinking, gee, perhaps capitalism isn't building the best products for my security they think "oh gee, the chinese have a whole apparatus of surveillance looking to get into my <insert todays problem>. Then someone exploits sed insecurity and the circle of paranoia is complete.

It's basically the digital version of chinese weather balloons. Lets just spend 250k shooting it down cause there's a 1% chance it's voodoo magic.

	▲	voakbasda 6 hours ago \| parent [-]
		You realize that a lot of these devices have been found to phone home to servers in the motherland, right? Without informing the user they were doing so? Or would be expected for the class and function of device? You wanna explain how that was just “buggy and insecure”?