| ▲ | DARPA, U.S. Air Force fly AI-controlled F-16(darpa.mil) |
| 53 points by r2sk5t 4 hours ago | 50 comments |
| |
|
| ▲ | 1970-01-01 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| All Stealth bombers are upgraded with Cyberdyne computers, becoming fully unmanned. Afterwards they fly with a perfect operational record. The Skynet funding bill is passed. The system goes on-line on August 4, 1997. Human decisions are removed from strategic defense. Skynet begins to learn at a geometric rate. It becomes self-aware at 2:14 a.m. Eastern time, August 29. In a panic, they try to pull the plug.
|
| |
| ▲ | testplzignore an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Interesting coincidence that both this article and the Hugging Face "security incident" post were on July 16. These will be mandatory reading in future Skynet History classes, assuming we survive the war. | |
| ▲ | alpn an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | ref: https://youtu.be/4DQsG3TKQ0I?t=29 | |
| ▲ | throw310822 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | No worries, these will all be controlled by AIs sitting in orbiting data centers part of the Starlink constellation. And in any case, no one is building humanoid robots. | |
| ▲ | SaltyBackendGuy 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Ha - this was the first thing that came to mind. I read this in Arnold's voice. | | |
| ▲ | ben7799 an hour ago | parent [-] | | I didn't read it in Arnold's voice till I saw your comment, so thank you. |
| |
| ▲ | justsomehnguy an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | I find it quite sombre to see this comment from a peson with that handle. |
|
|
| ▲ | recursivedoubts 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| A computer can never be held accountable
Therefore a computer must make all unpopular management decisions
|
| |
| ▲ | wartywhoa23 an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | This whole AI hype is such a convenient cover for the decisions of the 0.001% | | | |
| ▲ | LeifCarrotson an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | That's not precisely how I remember that quote... But it's on the Internet, so my memory must be faulty. | |
| ▲ | jauntywundrkind 39 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | With apologies, I don't particularly enjoy when people do this, and I don't think it adds a lot, but I want to leave this breadcrumb, I wrote a post on this a couple days ago here, on an anti-AI screed submission, saying this anti-politic, this accountability denial, is very much the point. Taking this quote and seeing exactly that potential for abuse seems very very much like the point. Strong agree, strongly against leaving non-seeing non-thinking alien intelligences with no accountability and proprietary programming to judge us. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48965083 |
|
|
| ▲ | Zsfe510asG an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The article smells of AI psychosis. They are already "orchestrating". In the first Iraq war, they went in and won. In the second one, it took years to sort of occupy the country. Now they struggle against Iran and "orchestrate" F-16s that can be shot down instantly by AA weapons. Since COVID the world has collectively lost its mind. |
| |
| ▲ | FrustratedMonky an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Drones really changed the equation more than Covid. Autonomous F-16's already can win against all human pilots. This would have been big 20 years ago. Now the cheap drones make it not the biggest deal anymore. | | |
| ▲ | justsomehnguy an hour ago | parent [-] | | > Autonomous F-16's already can win against all human pilots. In a dogfight? | | |
| ▲ | whartung an hour ago | parent [-] | | As I understand it, they done this in simulation, and the human pilots did not fare well. I don't know of the computer aircraft were able to fly beyond human limits (i.e. they don't black out) or not. If the computers can actually fly to what the airframe is capable of, they would have a distinct advantage over the human pilots. |
|
| |
| ▲ | tokai an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | What are you talking about, Iraq fell in a month not years. | | |
| ▲ | codeddesign an hour ago | parent [-] | | Did it? You mean operational govt fell. The country was fought over for 10 yrs, which the U.S. then backed out. Israel got a regime change while U.S. tax payers received the bill. In the end, it’s still a country. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | SoftTalker an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > The kit utilizes a novel interface with the aircraft’s flight controls and mission systems, allowing a pilot to toggle between traditional human control and AI control with the flip of a switch. This ensures a safe, reliable environment for human-on-the-loop experimentation. How, exactly, does that ensure a safe reliable environment? Humans are pretty bad at suddenly taking over when an automatic system reaches its limits and throws a problem in the human's lap. A lot of air upsets and crashes start when the autopilot disengages and hands control of a badly configured aircraft back to a human pilot. |
|
| ▲ | chis an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Absolutely terrifying. I'm sure they will soon find that AI pilots defeat human ones in dogfights 100% of the time, since they have faster reaction times, can tolerate higher G forces, and can be perfectly RL trained in the flight sims we already have. It's really incredible to me that people aren't protesting in the streets over this stuff. Just in the last month we have
* AI that goes rogue and hacks billion-dollar companies
* AI solving long-standing math problems without any meaningful human help
* AI controlled autonomous drones in Ukraine and F-16s in America
* AI now represents over 50% of GDP growth in America and yearly capex will soon exceed the size of the $1 trillion US military budget Is there any line where the public will become deeply concerned? I mean it really all reads like a sci-fi plot with a bad ending at the moment. |
| |
| ▲ | IsTom 31 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | Are dogfights still relevant? Isn't it mostly shooting missiles outside of visual range these days? | |
| ▲ | impulser_ an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | These systems still require a human to command the jet, they jsut don't have to be inside them. "This critical testing will pave the way for human pilots to seamlessly command and orchestrate teams of autonomous, uncrewed aircraft." The reason they are doing this is because the Military is already building a bunch of autonomous drones and fighter jets that already run on this system so they are retrofitting existing equipment with the same system so they can all fly together. "Ultimately, the capabilities advanced under AIR will enable a wide variety of future joint force operations, including Collaborative Combat Aircraft programs." Which are these: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manned-unmanned_teaming And everyone is developing these. | |
| ▲ | jandrewrogers 24 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Dogfights aren't really a thing for a modern military. What the AI enables is much higher endurance than is feasible with a human in the loop. They planes can stay flying as long as they can be refueled, which is also going AI. | |
| ▲ | philipwhiuk 39 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | > I'm sure they will soon find that AI pilots defeat human ones in dogfights 100% of the time, Unfortunately you're wrong. It's not soon. It's 6 years ago. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DARPA_AlphaDogfight |
|
|
| ▲ | tyjen an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Human control in flight has often taken a backseat to automation. For example, the SR-71, built in the 60s flew too fast to rely on human decision making for several tasks. If they were off by a fraction of a second, they would miss their intended recon target; so, both the navigation and sensor control were largely automated. Seems odd to invest this much into AI flight of aircraft designed for manned flight, when it would be better to build craft spec'd for AI flight without human life support systems. |
| |
| ▲ | jandrewrogers 29 minutes ago | parent [-] | | The US military has thousands of old airframes, many of which can be made flyable with very short turnaround. They already use the F-16 as test targets. Taking an obsolete airframe that is already paid for and adding AI to it is much cheaper than building a completely new AI-native airframe from scratch. This is finding a new use for old aircraft. You can send a bunch of old AI-driven F-16s on high-risk missions without worrying about a human pilot or cost. The airframes may be relatively obsolete but can still do plenty of damage on their day. The new 6th generation aircraft are all being designed as "manned optional". That is probably the last generation with affordances for a pilot. |
|
|
| ▲ | seydor 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Sounds like a very expensive drone |
| |
| ▲ | icegreentea2 an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Yes-ish. There's a lot of different and overlapping programs in play here. I do not believe that autonomous F-16s are intended to be operational assets. That said... VENOM - program that shows you can bolt on autonomous flight control into a standard F-16. Previously, the X-62A (a one-off prototype based F-16) demonstrated autonomous dogfighting back in 2023. VENOM provides USAF/DARPA with a lot of high performance autonomous platforms (bolt-on F-16s) that they can then use to develop and validate software, tactics and training for actually fighting with autonomous systems. This would presumably be critical for getting the most of the CCA (aka loyal wingman) programs currently in development. The AIR program referenced is basically "how do we get autonomous systems to control and fight effectively as a team (presumably arbitrary mixture of manned and unmanned systems) in a beyond visual range fight". The ACE program referenced was basically "how do we get autonomous platforms to dogfight" with related questions like "how can we augment the human pilot in a dogfight - ie, how can we hand off the actual flying and execution of manoeuvres, and using all of the sensors to autonomous systems, and let the pilot choose actions, instead of hang flying the actions". | |
| ▲ | Eridrus an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I'm sure there will be a next generation of jet drones that are cheaper, but the autonomy kit here is probably still cheaper than new jet drones. I think most fully autonomous jet drone programs are also designed to work with a main crewed fighter jet that coordinates them, so there is also a benefit in getting the fighter jet to be able to fly better than a pilot. | | | |
| ▲ | cucumber3732842 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | More like it'll fly itself while the pilot engages in other tasks. Every pound of weapons officer/navigator is a pound you can't put on target all else being equal. | | |
| ▲ | jackb4040 an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | * You're absolutely right. My altitude is dropping precipitously. Let me check my elevator position to see if that's causing the problem. * Bash Check elevator position * Thought for 8s | |
| ▲ | wartywhoa23 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | "I apologize, that was indeed a wedding party, not a terrorist camp I wrongly assumed. You are totally right, wasting those 3 Hydras was unacceptable. On a brighter side, we've got 39 more to go! Should I seek another target looking similar to the one I unintentionally destroyed so as to tune my decision-making, or give you an advice on how to wipe the traces of this mishap from the mission data recorder?" | |
| ▲ | ErroneousBosh 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | So like some sort of automatic pilot then? | | |
| ▲ | cucumber3732842 an hour ago | parent [-] | | Conventional autpilot is like a zip tie on the throttle, only it deals in outputs (your actual heading) rather than inputs (pedals and stick) I assume what they're going for here is something substantially smarter and more reactive to changing conditions than that. Something that can be used during the "unscripted" parts of the flight during which a) you're most likely to have multiple crew working hard b) you're most likely to be pushing the limits of what one crew can do. |
| |
| ▲ | throw310822 an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | Does the presence of humans on board limit the maneuverability of these aircraft in any way? E.g. in terms of acceleration? | | |
| ▲ | rvba an hour ago | parent [-] | | Yes. Humans can survive 9g for only a few seconds, while a drone could do much sharper manouvers | | |
| ▲ | StableAlkyne an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | While they can, drones are still limited by physics. Sure, the aircraft can pull a ton of G's to defeat a missile or achieve a firing solution. Maybe it even succeeded at that. It still pulled 9+ Gs and has burned an incredible amount of kinetic energy doing do. And the harder it pulls, the quicker it bleeds speed. It might not be able to defeat the next missile or outmaneuver the other plane's buddies because it is now slow and very likely outside its optimal turning speed. Even today, missiles can pull dozens of G's yet still are defeatable by humans who can only pull about 9. | |
| ▲ | ChrisMarshallNY an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | But they also have their limits. Bolts and trusses (and solder joints) have tensile strength limits, but it can be higher than what humans can take. |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | RIMR 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Drones have human operators. This is a murderbot. | | |
|
|
| ▲ | robotnikman an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The drones of Ace Combat 7 are coming closer to reality |
|
| ▲ | reactordev an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| This is a huge waste of resources. F-16s were designed for humans. You can get MUCH better results designing the airframe around the lack of one. |
| |
|
| ▲ | an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| [deleted] |
|
| ▲ | megous an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Not a great thing for aggressive state prone to electing nutjobs and supporting genocides to have automated killing machines that will not even get PTSD afterwards. |
|
| ▲ | calebio 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Hey look, the lawn darts are now AI-controlled. |
|
| ▲ | yashthakker an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| [dead] |
|
| ▲ | willmadden 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| What a waste of resources. |