Hmmm, a company that hosts open models is telling us how good open models are...

JSR_FDED 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

They share their methodology and results. I learned things about the relative strengths and weaknesses of Kimi and Fable I hadn’t seen anywhere else. Should being in the model hosting business disqualify them from sharing?

▲

Avicebron an hour ago | parent | next [-]

People are allowed to say, "hey we make money off of this thing, it's cheaper and almost as good as the thing we can't money off".

Other people are allowed to call them on that.

▲

jrflo an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

Doesn't disqualify them, but it may call into question their results seeing as they have a potential conflict of interest.

	▲	an hour ago \| parent [-]
		[deleted]

▲

mrinterweb 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The don't only host open weight models. Also, why not promote this. If Fireworks thinks this big news might convert some new business doesn't make it not true.

	▲	jrflo an hour ago \| parent \| next [-]
		I'd be doing the same thing if I were them as a marketing move
	▲	30minAdayHN 2 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		and in fact, it would be detrimental to business, if they wrongly promote Kimi, as they would pretty soon lose trust with their users

▲

yogthos 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Anybody who's tried it knows that what they're saying is true though.