No, it is not. Whataboutism is a specific term created (by Cold War propagandists) to refer to when the US criticizes the USSR about "X," and the Soviet Union replies by asking about "Y" in the US.

It is not a term created to refer to when some American criticizes any of America's official enemies for "X," and someone else reminds you that America also does exactly "X."

▲

jayd16 3 hours ago | parent [-]

> "Whataboutism" or "whataboutery" (as in, "but what about X?") refers to the propaganda strategy of responding to an accusation with a counter-accusation instead of offering an explanation or defense against the original accusation.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whataboutism

This is a counter accusation and not a defense, ergo, whataboutism.

	▲	shimman 6 minutes ago \| parent \| next [-]
		No, it would be whataboutism to say something like "but in America you extrajudicially kill citizens for protesting the government." It's not whataboutism to talk about the same subject in the context of a different government. In this case LLM corporations. All you're doing is deflecting valid criticism. It's not whataboutism to talk about how bad American corporations are to American citizens in the context of talking about how supposedly bad Chinese corporations are to American citizens (China doesn't profit off of the deaths of Americans like health insurance companies (this is whataboutism for example)).
	▲	3 hours ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		[deleted]
	▲	rq1 2 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		I never understood how people referred to or understood “whataboutsim”. I personally understand it not as a diversion but as a critique of the moral higher ground implied by the first accusation. Said differently: keep your own house in order.