| ▲ | margalabargala 17 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||
The reason you are getting "but there is a market for cheap models" as a response, is people saying in a roundabout way "but soon models may not need to be updated". Models like Kimi 3, GLM 5.2, or even Fable 5 for that matter are reasonable to burn to.ASIC because they are over the threshold of "good enough to be generally useful", something that will continue to be true in the future. Most people do not need the latest model, they need a sufficient model. If I had Fable 5 on an ASIC, I imagine I would use that and ignore paying API rates for Fable 6. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | stillpointlab 17 hours ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||
> but soon models may not need to be updated Which is why my original post mentioned the volatility in models. We aren't just doing research on frontier, there is a huge amount of research on quantization, distillation, etc. that is changing the landscape at the low-end almost as much as it is changing on the frontier. And it is also why I mention revealed preference. What feels sufficient / "good enough" today is a moving target. This isn't just a question of what you want, it is a question of what is economically viable for the entity that will be designing, manufacturing and marketing this ASIC of which you speak. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||