Remix.run Logo
happypappy123 19 hours ago

[dead]

basisword 19 hours ago | parent [-]

The only friction here is 'you're not allowed to do that' - which doesn't typically work on teenagers. We had the same rules for dumbbphones and iPod's 20 years ago and it didn't work then.

Rebelgecko 17 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Fwiw when I was in school kids would definitely check their phones from time to time or send an occasional surreptitious text. But it wasn't as pervasive as it is today- I was pretty shocked to see even at the elementary school level how much class time kids spend on their personal devices

amelius 18 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> which doesn't typically work on teenagers

Depends. You have "good kids" and "bad kids".

If this law helps the good kids, then that's at least a win.

Jtsummers 19 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

In many US schools, they'd take those things away (and return them at end of day, typically) 20-30 years ago. But it helps when it's policy, if it's not a policy then the teacher has no backing from the school.

bilekas 19 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It definitely reduced usesge though. I was the same age in teens with dumb phones and they were only banned in class. Either way, it's better to have the restrictions in this case than a free for all because teenagers will push limits constantly. I don't see a downside to this.

zdragnar 17 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It absolutely worked in my school a little over 20 years ago. Teachers and staff always took away disallowed devices and that set the tone quite well.

throw1234567891 19 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

If it’s legally grounded you get more options.

oblio 19 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I've talked to parents of kids where they banned smartphones and the difference is palpable. And good.

dbbk 17 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Eh? It did work. You'd get it confiscated off you.

17 hours ago | parent | prev [-]
[deleted]