To answer for OP:

We are now calling text and image generators "intelligent" in the same way a spell checker is intelligent.

Whatever it's become, "AI" research started as a way to study digital neurology, or how to digitize a mind, not just how to generate data.

The Turing Test should have had a caveat, it needs to fool a, "non-stupid" person, and we still have not gotten even close to passing that version.

▲

radial_symmetry 2 days ago | parent [-]

What exactly would a 'non-stupid' person do to catch the latest models on a Turing Test? Aside from being aware of AI 'tells' like em-dashes.

▲

dominotw 2 days ago | parent [-]

If this was true. I would repalce myself with ai that pretends to be me on slack.

my coworkers would know almost immediately if i did that.

▲

HeatrayEnjoyer 2 days ago | parent [-]

> my coworkers would know almost immediately if i did that.

The same would happen if you were replaced by any random human.

▲

daveguy 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

But immitating others is about the only thing genAI does. Sometimes "others" is a 'programmer', sometimes "others" is an 'artist', but regardless, it still does it poorly.

▲

dominotw 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

that would be a silly test then

▲

pixl97 2 days ago | parent [-]

It sounds kind of like you made up a silly test then.

	▲	dominotw a day ago \| parent [-]
		what test?