Totally insane. Repeating the same errors as in the past and hoping for a better outcome... Only corruption can explain that...

▲

kube-system 31 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

I have read that self-issuance of airworthiness certificates has been normal since the 1950s. Given that, I don't think the issue is due to regulatory corruption but an issue at Boeing which has (hopefully) been resolved.

	▲	estearum 15 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		"The issue" at Boeing is obscene levels of financialization which, of course, has not been "solved."

▲

bob001 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Let's see if the EU shows some backbone or not.

▲

shevy-java an hour ago | parent [-]

The EU is like a tiger - without teeth, fur or claws. I think the only thing that works here is total boycott of airplanes that constantly unalive people through mass crashes. (Wikipedia really gathers useful data here in a simple-to-read manner: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_accidents_and_incident...)

▲

freeone3000 an hour ago | parent | next [-]

You can and should say the word “kill”.

▲

worik an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Interesting analogy, maybe a house cat?

I think a better analogy is "The EU is like a lumbering elephant. You can steer it, but only if you know how. Otherwise it just keeps on lumbering"

Airbus was a bureaucrats wet dream, and by modern Biz Bro standards should never have got off the ground.

Now it rules the skies. Boeing, having drunk the financial Kool Aid is wilting

Tortoise and the hare?

	▲	moomin 44 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		It turns out that sometimes you really do want health and safety obsessed bureaucrats.

▲

cindyllm 15 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

[dead]

▲

bobthebob 41 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

Can you explain exactly why this is bad?

	▲	estearum 14 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		"Plane crashes are bad, actually" - quickly becoming a lib-coded statement apparently