| ▲ | londons_explore a day ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Probably not actually. Transferring one kilobyte across a network link has such a low value that the billing costs of aggregating it cost more than the revenue. So instead you take a probabilistic approach - charge the user for a megabyte of data transfer 0.1% of the time, and bill nothing 99.9% of the time. Now the typical cost is the same, the users bill is probably accurate to the cent, but you have divided the number of billing records by 1000. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | svobodovic a day ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
I don't know how cloud services count usage, but this is certainly not true for telco. I manage several fleets of hundreds/thousands of SIM cards (mostly IoT/M2M applications), and almost every provider counts the data traffic per byte. Different business and use case, I know, but still. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | michaelmrose a day ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
The way you describe requires somehow counting every bit but somehow discarding most which is obviously nonsense. This seems statistically invalid insofar as it will tend to overbill potentially by a lot on the minority of cases. Don't you know how much of the pipe is occupied by a given customers code at any given time or what data is being sent | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||