| ▲ | michaelmrose a day ago | |||||||||||||
The way you describe requires somehow counting every bit but somehow discarding most which is obviously nonsense. This seems statistically invalid insofar as it will tend to overbill potentially by a lot on the minority of cases. Don't you know how much of the pipe is occupied by a given customers code at any given time or what data is being sent | ||||||||||||||
| ▲ | londons_explore a day ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||
You have to do it when the customer list is too big to keep a counter per customer. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||