'Likweli': A new monkey species discovered in the Congo Basin

▲ 'Likweli': A new monkey species discovered in the Congo Basin(news.yale.edu)

57 points by gmays 6 hours ago | 8 comments

▲ pfdietz 2 hours ago | parent | next [-]

The new species is an example of a "cryptic species": a species that is morphologically similar to another species but can be distinguished by DNA.

Cryptic species are astoundingly common. A recent paper estimates that each known vertebrate morphological species is, on average, actually two cryptic species.

https://royalsocietypublishing.org/rspb/article/293/2064/202...

▲ gregjw 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

wake up babe new monkey just dropped

▲ rickdangerous1 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The bigfoot folks will be talking about this for years.

▲ fsckboy 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I assume there are local people living in the jungle there? did the researchers ask them what they think? perhaps Likweli looks, well, like other monkeys around there, and in the pre-Darwin West people were probably not super clear about about small differences between species. I'm just curious, usually for monkeys there are some humans around who've been eating them.

this paragraph mentions it but doesn't clear much up:

>Residents in only eight villages reported knowledge of the species and could accurately describe it. Since people in the region typically have detailed knowledge of local flora and fauna, this supports the notion that Likweli is a cryptic species, the researchers said.

▲ walrus01 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

There is more detail here: https://www.fau.edu/newsdesk/articles/new-monkey-species-con...

"The newly identified primate is not only genetically and anatomically distinct from other African colobus monkeys but is further distinguished by its vocalizations. Its deep, resonant roaring calls resemble those of related Colobus species but possess a distinct acoustic structure.

Researchers also incorporated local ecological knowledge to better understand the species’ distribution and behavior, speaking with residents and hunters across villages in the Lomami National Park’s buffer zone. Only eight villages recognized the species or could accurately describe it. Local communities referred to the monkey as “Likweli” and “kasaba nkoni,” the latter meaning “the branch shaker,” and described it as elusive and rarely seen."

"Between 2018 and 2022, researchers recorded 114 sightings across an estimated range of just 1,700 square kilometers – an unusually small range for colobus monkeys. C. congoensis appears naturally isolated by rivers and forest barriers and dependent on scattered upland forest patches in the Congo Basin."

-----------

My understanding of the local terrain and jungle there is that 'upland forest' is not well suited for manual labor type human agriculture, so there would be few if any villages directly in its habitat. And not frequent reasons for the people who live near it to go directly into its habitat, and even when they do, it's living high up in the tree canopy and may not be directly observed.

▲ Diogenesian 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Maybe you skipped over this in the beginning:

  The species, Colobus congoensis, is a rare and cryptic monkey largely unknown even among people living within its range. But those who are familiar with the small, black monkeys — an arboreal creature marked by distinctive orange-cream patches around their mouths and noses — call them “Likweli,” which the researchers recommend remain the species’ common name.

Otherwise I am a little confused what you're asking about.

Edit: also see the point that there is a very similar Colobus monkey more widely known by locals, but this is a distinct species known only to a few, and until 2018 was previously unknown even to local naturalists/explorers.

▲

culi 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Yeah the second paragraph explicitly says the name "likweli" is the local name for it.

A lot of people seem confused about what "new species of [insert terrestrial animal]" means in 2026. Maybe it's a science communication failure. It'd be more correct and less confusing if we use "scientifically described" instead of "discovered". Even 100 years ago, almost every newly described species was already known and often named by local indigenous groups.

I'm reminded of how astounded modern botanists are at the "folk taxonomy" of Cahuilla people for oak species. They have a word for every modern species. An astounding feat given how notoriously difficult Quercus species are to differentiate given their profuse tendency to hybridize

	▲	mmooss an hour ago \| parent [-]
		> A lot of people seem confused about what "new species of [insert terrestrial animal]" means in 2026. Are there comments here reflecting confusion? Species is a relatively straightforward term, especially in a relatively scientifically literate community. The researchers and authors of the article discuss surveying locals about the species. > They have a word for every modern species. Every modern species of oak grows where they live? A quick search says 450 species of oak, spread across continents: https://www.internationaloaksociety.org/content/updated-glob...