|
| ▲ | marcosdumay 11 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| That probably includes things like bonus for signing up or recommending people, or discounts for new users. Also, that certainly includes a lot of money for making all of the media and management training and consulting talking about them. Teams to talk about it on social media, agreements to increase its impact on visibility algorithms... > And they would be everywhere How are you not seeing LLM companies ads everywhere? |
|
| ▲ | cmiles8 a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| “Marketing” typically includes all the people in solutions architecture, developer advocacy, compute credits, and many other things. It’s a ton more than just advertising spend, which is often a minority of what appears on that line item. Given that it’s very plausible those sort of sums are realistic. |
| |
|
| ▲ | surgical_fire a day ago | parent | prev [-] |
| My charitable guess is that they lump the compute expense for free users as "Marketing". My less than charitable guess is that the leaked financials is a piece of fiction intended to make inference not look unprofitable. |
| |
| ▲ | therobots927 a day ago | parent [-] | | I see what you mean. If they are using it for customer acquisition, it could fall under sales and marketing. What about retention though? Or upselling to higher tiers? I would question where they decided to draw the line… because it’s a grey area. |
|