| ▲ | ls612 7 hours ago | |||||||
A lot of this is states trying to figure out a way around the first amendment to regulate social media that the courts will wink and accept. That is why you see so many convoluted laws being drawn up by state legislatures about this. | ||||||||
| ▲ | AlexandrB 4 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||
What should be changed is the exemption algorithmically curated feeds still get under section 230. This has always seemed like a huge loophole. Once social media feeds are picking and choosing what to show users based on opaque criteria they are no longer neutral carriers of information but more like newspaper editors. They should be liable for what the users see. | ||||||||
| ||||||||