new | show | ask | jobs Github

Retr0id an hour ago

And the other half of the community seems fixated on upvoting AI slop.

▲

ddtaylor an hour ago | parent [-]

Sounds needlessly divisive.

Why not criticize the content instead of the source or medium?

▲

Retr0id 11 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

The medium is the message, which is especially true when it exists as content-marketing for their anti-anti-scraping product for AI companies to use to improve their ability to emulate blogs, among other things.

▲

queenkjuul an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

"The content is AI slop and not worth reading"

▲

ddtaylor 2 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

None of that is specific to the actual content. Might as well just say "I don't like it" which is also not objective analysis.

This article was about math functions, chrome, etc. If the author got something wrong, mention that, or if you don't like the pacing or how the content was divided into pieces, etc.

▲

fragmede 39 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

We all want signal and no noise, but complaining about whether or not it's noise is just more noise.

	▲	queenkjuul 26 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		It's a signal to those who haven't read it yet that it isn't worth reading