Sounds needlessly divisive.

Why not criticize the content instead of the source or medium?

Retr0id 9 minutes ago | parent | next [-]

The medium is the message, which is especially true when it exists as content-marketing for their anti-anti-scraping product for AI companies to use to improve their ability to emulate blogs, among other things.

▲

queenkjuul an hour ago | parent | prev [-]

"The content is AI slop and not worth reading"

▲

ddtaylor a few seconds ago | parent | next [-]

None of that is specific to the actual content. Might as well just say "I don't like it" which is also not objective analysis.

This article was about math functions, chrome, etc. If the author got something wrong, mention that, or if you don't like the pacing or how the content was divided into pieces, etc.

▲

fragmede 37 minutes ago | parent | prev [-]

We all want signal and no noise, but complaining about whether or not it's noise is just more noise.

	▲	queenkjuul 25 minutes ago \| parent [-]
		It's a signal to those who haven't read it yet that it isn't worth reading