| ▲ | Grombobulous 4 hours ago | |||||||
I am doing a double take reading your comment and the parent comment of yours. They’re just so wildly corporate-biased. I’m really not sure how we can conclude that the freedom is symmetrical. The fact that this story made national news says everything about how rare it is for an employer to win a case like this. In most cases you just get fired for any reason with no notice or off-ramp. The employer is just always correct by default and you can easily be denied unemployment insurance because the company cooked up some official looking documents showing that you were fired with cause. A corporation can spread risk by having 1,000 employees. I can’t have 1,000 jobs. It’s just not equal on both sides. I mean, “incredible freedom is equal on both sides,” in the only developed country where there’s no mandatory paid parental leave and basic healthcare access depends on employment? Spare me. | ||||||||
| ▲ | IcyWindows 3 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||
My comments are not "corporate-biased", they are business owner biased, which includes small businesses. Employment is an free arrangement between two entities, not a modern day serfdom where the employers are now responsible for their serfs housing, food, etc. | ||||||||
| ||||||||