| ▲ | Tenoke 2 hours ago |
| >He's merely said they don't think He said years ago even 'GPT 5000' couldnt do things that they ended up doing fine a month later, let alone by 5000. His later predictions are just moving that goal post including towards them not being able to do more general, harder problems of which Arc AGI is a counter-example. |
|
| ▲ | onlyrealcuzzo 2 hours ago | parent [-] |
| > He said even 'GPT 5000' couldnt do things that they could do a month later, let alone by 5000. What things specifically and when? |
| |
| ▲ | Tenoke 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | https://youtube.com/shorts/zQTt8TkcyfU?is=09r7XDqz2w6-Pygu You probably wont like the edit but I dont have the timestamp of the original on hand, you can find it. | | |
| ▲ | onlyrealcuzzo an hour ago | parent [-] | | That does not at all look cherry picked or taken out of context... LeCun's ideas cannot be reduced to a 6 second clip... You're missing the forrest for the trees, taking a singular example of a problem and thinking that if an LLM can solve the singular example it completely disproves LeCun is comical... | | |
| ▲ | Tenoke an hour ago | parent [-] | | You can watch the whole Lex Friedman interview, it's on youtube. It's not out of context at all. He goes on about how LLMs will never be able to do things that they do trivially. And he has just doubled down for years. Ive read and watched more of his interviews and lectures it seems, it feels like you just have a rosier idea of his views than the views he repeatedly presents. |
|
|
|
