| ▲ | cm2012 5 hours ago |
| All data centers that are in controversial areas should offer free heated swimming pools for the neighborhood. You could add a giant pool complex as a percentage or two of the cost of a big data center. |
|
| ▲ | kobalsky 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| and AI deniers were saying we were gonna get boiled like frogs, instead we got free heated swimming pools, wait a minute ... |
| |
| ▲ | NBJack 4 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | | I like to think that the heating, much like their ideal govermental oversight, would have no regulation. I can almost hear the anguished cries of pool goers when a new model gets released and the temperature spikes. | |
| ▲ | 21asdffdsa12 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Have some free garlic butter cube - and some congnac to cool down.. its on the house.. truffles? |
|
|
| ▲ | cogman10 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Personally, I think these data centers should be championing and pushing for district heating and cooling. Even smaller data centers will be producing enough waste heat to heat 10s of thousands of homes. So why not make residents love you by funding the installation of a district heating system which gives your compute power a symbiotic relationship with the community. Their energy bills go down naturally because your cooling efforts are heating their homes and cooling their homes and you spend less in the winter cooling your servers because that heat is being distributed throughout the community. It doesn't even have to be free district heating/cooling, just cheaper than using electric or gas heaters. |
|
| ▲ | victorbjorklund 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I feel like this is one of those things that sounds good, but it's not. It's probably cheaper to build it far away from residential areas, and it's probably better for the people living there to not live too close to a data center. |
| |
| ▲ | gigatree 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Why, is there some hidden downside to living by a data center? Northern VA real estate is super pricey but they’ve got tons of them | | |
| ▲ | pocksuppet 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | The new ones are being built with massive numbers of unpermitted gas turbines with the exhaust filters removed, because there's not enough electricity and there isn't enough grid power and exhaust filtering costs money. So they're giving entire nearby towns asthma. They're also so loud the whole town can't sleep. Data centers were, and still can be, some of the cleanest industrial facilities - but the ones being built in this AI wave are not, because they are being built as cheaply and as quickly as possible and without regards to proper infrastructure. | | |
| ▲ | chasd00 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | > The new ones are being built with massive numbers of unpermitted gas turbines with the exhaust filters removed That’s every local investigative journalist’s wet dream. Can you link us to a source please? PS saw an interview with he who shouldn’t be named and they made an interesting point that there isn’t a way to scale the manufacturing of gas turbine blades, there will never be enough gas turbines for these DCs to come online as scheduled. | | |
| ▲ | Konnstann 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | https://www.epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/2026/4/whitehous... not quite local investigative journalism but should suffice | | |
| ▲ | chasd00 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | here's something more local and what i would expect. However, it's murky [link at the bottom] "Mississippi officials told xAI it could run the generators without an air permit because they were deemed “temporary” and “mobile” units.". Makes sense because as far as i can tell they were on trailers. but then there's this:
"But lawyers at the Southern Environmental Law Center, representing the NAACP in the federal lawsuit, have long maintained that such a loophole doesn’t exist, and that running such turbines without a permit violates the federal Clean Air Act. “Mobile, temporary, portable, whatever you want to call them, turbines need air permits,” Patrick Anderson, a center attorney, told Mississippi Today." as per typical, it's not clear who's right https://mississippitoday.org/2026/04/15/data-center-turbines... |
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | 1234letshaveatw 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | why must we tear up undeveloped areas for data centers instead of backfilling vacant industrial areas? Humanity will never rest until all of the world is a brownfield | | |
| ▲ | SoftTalker 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | It's cheaper to build on vacant land than to get construction equipment and materials into a built up area, possibly discovering underground tanks and other surprises that can inflate the project cost, etc. City ordinances may also limit work hours and/or noise. Rural land is cheap and there are fewer neighbors to annoy with the 24/7 construction activity. | |
| ▲ | chasd00 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | The current NIMBY trend with respect to DCs guarantees it. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | gruez 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Surely it's just cheaper to build further away from residential areas? For this to work you'd need to be close to residential areas, but that's where you get the most NIMBY opposition. And if the datacenter is in the middle of some industrial park, who would want to drive 30 minutes to an industrial park to have a swim? |
| |
| ▲ | macNchz 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | An outdoor heated pool that’s open all winter in a cold climate would be a destination worth a drive. A rather decadent use of energy otherwise, it’d be a good use for waste heat. There’s prior art in the Blue Lagoon in Iceland, a destination spa that uses water from a geothermal power plant. | | |
| ▲ | fmbb 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | The Blue Lagoon is more like using waste cold than waste heat. |
| |
| ▲ | nucleardog 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | As a kid I have memories of driving a bit out the edge of town to a big steel plant for almost exactly this reason, it's not totally insane. There's plenty of free parking, free admission, giant pool with some small waterslides and stuff, a bunch of picnic tables and public barbecues, generally some nice greenery and trees for shade, ponds and fountains and stuff, a bandstand, etc. It's not somewhere you'd pop over to for a "quick swim", but especially for lower income people it's a great place to have around as a "grab a pack of hotdogs and your swim trunks and make a day of it" sort of thing. As a kid we couldn't afford to, say, go to the actual waterslide park or anything so I have a lot of fond memories of visiting the steel plant. I'm sure the construction and upkeep was less than a rounding error in terms of construction and upkeep costs for the plant itself. | |
| ▲ | lvspiff 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | The best waterparks in Tucson, AZ were on the outskirts of the city and worked great as a place to "travel" to for the parents as the kids would be wiped out on the way back. Breakers....Justins....how i miss those days of running around on hot pavement or gravel in bare feat only to also step on some cactus... | | |
| ▲ | chasd00 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Hah yeah if you, as a parent, can survive a day at the water park in the sun then you’re all set for some quiet time when you get home. Waterparks zap kids and they pass out cold in the car as soon as the doors close. Same goes for the beach. |
| |
| ▲ | vidarh 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | The last place I lived, the nearest data centre was a few hundred meters from the local swimming pool, in a business park. Most people would never have known the data centre was there. Elsewhere, e.g. in London, Docklands is both full of high density data centres and high-end residential buildings and offices that could certain use the waste heat in winter at least. Most of the data centres there just looks like office buildings on the outside, and most residents won't know they are there. |
|
|
| ▲ | bee_rider 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Rather than pools specifically, maybe they could design District Heating systems. |
| |
| ▲ | bryanrasmussen 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | I was thinking more like if they externalized the heat release of the data centers enough they might even be able to heat the whole globe! | | |
| ▲ | bee_rider 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Probably not, at least, I’m pretty sure the heat directly produced by power consumption is minuscule compared to the global warming contribution of the fossil fuels used to produce it, right? | |
| ▲ | pletnes 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Most of the globe is above the boiling temperature of water due to trapped radionuclides since, well, the beginning. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | bojangleslover 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| This is an unironically good idea |
| |
| ▲ | cyanydeez 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | unfortunately, it's like saying all billionaires should let people swim in their pools when they're away. | | |
|
|
| ▲ | doron 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| All data centers that are in controversial areas should subsidize the electric bill of residents within the county affected |
|
| ▲ | erelong 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| free sauna free hot tub free publicity and good will gathered ("free") |