| ▲ | lenerdenator 2 hours ago | |||||||
The problem with the romantic partner analogy is that when things ended with my ex, I didn't lose my career continuity, health insurance and income stream that goes to pay my rent. Corporate culture spent the last fifty years convincing the working public that it was important to identify with your job, career, and most importantly, your employer. That's how you get the most out of a worker. If they identify themselves as - just as examples - "parent" or "spouse" first, those priorities can get in the way of their value creation for you. The employer can, of course, drop you as an employee pretty much at-will. You'll be left with shame, disillusionment, and potential financial setbacks, but they'll have accumulated the value from your best efforts. | ||||||||
| ▲ | ButlerianJihad 2 hours ago | parent [-] | |||||||
> didn't lose my career continuity, health insurance and income stream that goes to pay my rent. But that is basically the minimum set of consequences for any homemaker or non-breadwinner when a marriage fails. Think about women through the centuries, who’ve been faced with basically homelessness and poverty, and the full responsibility to all their children, if they divorced or separated. And then it becomes crystal clear why many people cling to suboptimal and abusive relationships, because really, we need one another. | ||||||||
| ||||||||