| ▲ | john_strinlai 2 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
if i said "hustler is banned from my school", and someone came along and said "it's not banned, it's just not allowed", i would laugh. the word "banned", specifically and only in the context of books, is one of the fucking strangest quirks of HN. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | topgrain2 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pretend confusion, especially over the very terms of the discussion, is a really common shitposting tactic all over the Internet. Though yeah it’s maybe more common here. Possibly because it falls under the category of trolling that doesn’t draw moderator ire (here, I mean, not in general) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | wonderwonder 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
its not strange. Books represent knowledge and ideas. Ways of thinking. An attempt to ban a book is an attempt to restrict freedom of thought and the exchange of ideas. It has a historical context and a ban is generally considered on a societal level, not building specific. Some books are not allowed in school buildings, they are not banned. Banning books for example has a very different context than banning cocaine. Cocaine use in the United States is banned, Hustler magazine is not. I can swing by the store tomorrow and pick one up legally, I can't get cocaine legally. Restricting Hustler from a school full of kids is not banning it. Thus the quirk. If I don't allow Green Eggs and Ham in my house does it belong in a museam of banned books? | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||