I'm not sure that's quite as clear as you say it is. It could be "his" as in "about the person" rather than "belonging to the person".

The Fourth Amendment covers exclusively “their persons, houses, papers, and effects” so it has to be one of those.

	▲	estearum an hour ago \| parent [-]
		This is not true. For example, this would allow the government to wiretap anyone without warrant. Katz v United States would be the place to start your research.