|
| ▲ | TSiege 11 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| "I love lax security features therefore you should too." Defaults should be safe and risky action should be done at the user's own discretion |
| |
| ▲ | apetresc 11 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | This isn't really security-related. The "AskUserQuestion" hook in question here is not the one that gets used for authorizing actions. That's a completely separate mechanism that is unaffected by this 60-second timer thing. What this is referring to are those follow-up "here's two plausible alternative ways to do this, which one do you prefer?" questions you sometimes get, and usually at the beginning of a planning session when presumably you're still actively involved in the session. They get exponentially less likely as the turn goes on. Maybe it's a good default, maybe it's not, I'll wait to pass judgment. But it's not security-related except in contrived scenarios you could construct where one side of an A-or-B UserQuestion has security implications that aren't caught by any other safeguard. I haven't ever really experienced that in practice. | |
| ▲ | solenoid0937 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | It's not security related. If you aren't running agents in a sandbox today, that's a "you" problem. It's purely architecture/design related and the last thing anyone wants is coming back at the end of the day to find their agent didn't make progress because it was stuck on a response. You can always redirect the agent or scrap its work, you can't undo the lost time. |
|
|
| ▲ | cyclopeanutopia 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| There are people who like to be pissed on, it doesn't mean it should be a default behavior. |
|
| ▲ | cameronsjo 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I couldn't be the polar opposite. If my agent is asking a question, that means I didn't do a good enough job building enough context (not necessarily a good prompt, but context). I have a hook that checks for a 'non-answer' from AskUserQuestion from when there was a different bug. It just so happens to be an accidental safeguard for me in this case. |
|
| ▲ | NikxDa 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| And yet other people rely on it doing exactly the opposite. Aside from whether this behavior is useful, it is never warranted to change such an important thing unannounced. |
|
| ▲ | Sharlin 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| You only live once, right?! |
|
| ▲ | grosswait 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| I’m pretty sure I used plan mode today and it continued when I didn’t respond quickly enough. Though now I can’t recall whether it was Claude or Codex. In either case terrible default. |
| |
