| ▲ | code_naked 5 hours ago |
| The Electrek article referenced is a better link: https://electrek.co/2026/07/01/tesla-semi-first-fatal-crash-... Either way, the interesting bit is: The reported cause — a driver falling asleep — puts the focus on the truck’s safety systems, not any self-driving software.
|
|
| ▲ | cyanydeez 4 hours ago | parent [-] |
| which, of course, is bullshit. "self-driving" excludes the intervention of a person. The state of a person during "self-driving" should be meaningless. If it is meaningful, then it's not "self-driving" |
| |
| ▲ | cwillu 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | “It’s also important to be precise about what this is and isn’t. This was not an autonomous driving crash. Tesla does not offer Full Self-Driving on the Semi — it’s still test-fleet hardware, spotted validating sensors in California just days earlier — so the driver was likely in full manual control. A driver falling asleep is a human-fatigue failure, not a software one, and anyone folding this into the FSD debate is confusing the story.” | | |
| ▲ | ZeroGravitas 32 minutes ago | parent [-] | | There are software systems that deal with the consequences of driver incapacity that are not "full self driving". |
|
|