Remix.run Logo
Remix clone Hacker News
new | show | ask | jobsGithub
▲ dofm 7 hours ago

The maths there is pretty undeniable, but it is not where I'd make the split. Having a machine that can run some modest local LLMs, like the Gemma 4 12B, is really worth it.

I don't know how much serious hands-free agentic coding I will ever do on my MacBook alone, but I do know that I would not have got so far into understanding this without tinkering with local models, llama.cpp, LM Studio, and LM Studio and all that.

I totally struggled to find the right frame of mind to explore any of this stuff without feeling defeated and bamboozled. Because it's just huge, exhausting, jargon-drenched, unknowable, and I am over the hill at fifty-plus.

Until, that is, I could poke around with setting it up on my own (secondhand) machine, watching the API calls, understanding some of the terminology. I didn't even buy the machine for that; it's just adequate to the task.

The Neo is too small to really get much benefit from this opportunity to make it more visceral and knowable.

▲pizza234 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

> Having a machine that can run some modest local LLMs, like the Gemma 4 12B, is really worth it.

Cloud models are (much) faster, they don't consume so much power/generate heat, they have much bigger (LLM) context, they're much more precise and they have a much wider (engineering) context of the given problem.

Except privacy and use cases that are blocked by cloud models (e.g. reverse engineering), local LLMs are currently an expensive toy.

When I try to program with a local LLM (I'm on a 32/128 GB system), I end up wasting time compared to a cloud LLM.

▲dofm 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Again, I would not argue against any of this.

And I can't say that I won't switch to openrouter (even just for the same models) at some point.

But one of the things I have found about my own process learning is that some lessons only come to you when you make yourself available to them. And if that means doing things the difficult way, that is what you should do.

▲wahnfrieden 6 hours ago | parent [-]

Difficult... and wastefully expensive

▲sanderjd 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Seems like an investment into building expertise, which is likely to have high ROI in the future, rather than a wasteful cost.

▲dofm 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I mean, it's a (secondhand) computer I bought for other tasks (processing very large photos, compiling large apps quickly). It's running all the time. It can also run LLMs when I want to.

The rest of my life is ultra-frugal so I am relaxed about this.

▲_puk 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Don't bite. You're right.

Having spent a good weekend learning how to perform latent-steering through playing with pytorch and a local Gemma4 model, there is no way I could have groked any of that in the the way I did without hands on time.

This is on an M3 Max 36GB I've had for a couple of years. No further outlay needed.

▲monkmartinez 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

My thinking is totally aligned with yours, perhaps its because I am trying to do a second act at almost 50 from blue-collar to white collar office work. I have no formal degree, but I have been hobby programming for 20 years. I have made a habit of "letting myself be available to all lessons"... the localllama group has made this journey really fun if nothing else. I have learned an ABSOLUTE ton from this era!

▲dofm 4 hours ago | parent [-]

I have been contemplating a move in the opposite direction because I have just been exhausted and depressed, so for me, really learning this stuff this way has been about managing those feelings, about a sense of pride and ownership of my processes.

I don't know if it has changed my mind about a career change but as I am sure you can understand, I no longer feel like I am running away defeated.

My very best wishes to you :-)

▲moffkalast 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

People pay thousands for model trains, everyone needs a hobby.

▲dofm 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Training models vs modelling trains

▲sanderjd 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> currently

The interesting question is whether that gap will narrow, and if so, how much, and on what timescale.

The exact answer to this question is not knowable, but if you are the kind of person who comes to a site called "hacker news", and you think there is a nonzero chance that the answer is that yes, the gap will narrow and this won't always be an expensive toy, then now seems like a pretty great time to get in the game and start exploring the capabilities.

▲bogeholm 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> Cloud models […] don't consume so much power/generate heat

I do realize the cloud is just someone else’s computer right? Power goes in, tokens and heat come out - just in another place

▲actionfromafar 4 hours ago | parent [-]

The cloud computers produce more tokens per watt. That said, if you have a computer at home running 24/7 for other reasons and you also can use it for some LLM work, why not.

▲AlpacaJones 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The key word there is 'currently'.

▲smt88 5 hours ago | parent [-]

Economies of scale are a fact of nature and aren’t going to be subverted in the future by even the most advanced local models

▲kennywinker 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Which is of course why, if you want to render 3d scenes to play a video game, you have to rent time on a mainframe system. I don’t see that changing ever - it’s just economies of scale!

(sarcasm, btw)

▲Gigachad 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The economies of scale gains are lost because you still have a middle man hosting provider who wants to profit too.

Over the long term it's always been better to buy than to rent, even if the renting option is technically more efficient on the GPUs, you don't have to pay some hosting providers profit margin.

▲oceanplexian 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Things can get both more expensive and cheaper at scale, hence the term.

For example (and relevant to AI) I can generate electricity on my roof at $0.20-25/kWh, batteries included. In California the electric utility can’t offer it cheaper than $0.30-0.50/kWh. Therefore at scale, electricity is actually more expensive.

There are many such examples.

▲sanderjd 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Yeah, I think the fallacy here is the conflation of scale and centralization.

Right now, there is way more scale in centralized AI than there is at the edge. But that could flip. I'd still probably put the probability that it will under 50%. But I'd also put it above zero!

▲sanderjd 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

... said the IBM executive to a young Bill Gates.

▲psychoslave 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Anything done local will likely come at higher cost and at scale with less energy efficiency and commodity, with less possibility to fine tune engineer deeply on wider horizon of issues.

That's never the point of keeping local alternatives though.

▲dofm 5 hours ago | parent [-]

Right.

For me this dates all the way back to installing Slackware 1.0 (0.99pl12!) on an offline 486SX rather than just using the internet-connected workstations in the lab.

Here, I already had a Mac that was powerful enough to run a local LLM, so now I do, because I can.

▲ 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]
[deleted]
▲ 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]
[deleted]
▲VerifiedReports 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Exactly. The distinction between the various layers in "AI" systems is pretty vague to the newcomer. What is the "model" vs. the engine "running" it vs. weights?

I don't recall any previous tech stack that was barfed onto the scene with so little background or reference material, going from zero to endless undefined jargon... and no primer in sight.

For people who demand an understanding of their tools, it's a lot of work. I recognize the value of "AI" in performing the tasks I'd have to do manually; for example, keeping the data structures of my front- and back-ends in sync in a project. But do I want to interrupt my development and take weeks off to digest all of these tools?

And if I do, I want to run the show and fully understand it. And like you, I think that's best done locally.

▲Fr0styMatt88 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

The most unexpected thing for me was kind of philosophical in a ‘holy shit’ way.

Cloud models still feel ‘magic’, like you send a request off and get something back, like it’s something ‘special’. I used to joke that ChatGPT might be some kind of mechanical turk underneath.

Watching a model run local on your own machine hits different — you realise that yes, it IS just a computer program. Which for me actually makes me appreciate the leap we’ve made MORE, not less. From an information-theoretic point of view, LLMs really are something special.

The fact that they are just programs, that I’ve now experienced first-hand that they’re just programs, makes all those questions around consciousness and intelligence much more interesting.

▲dofm 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Yep — it hasn't changed how I feel about what LLMs are capable of (and very much not capable of) but this visceral feeling is fascinating.

Like, just watching a computer I already owned act like ChatGPT with the wifi disconnected.

It was the first time I stopped feeling quite so helpless, somehow.

▲QuercusMax 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Yeah, it's been fun for me running models (mostly Qwen 3.6 27B) on my 48GB M4 MacBook Pro. When i'm using it to run models, it's basically unusable for anything else - I actually do the work on my Macbook Neo. Took me a while to figure out why the models couldn't figure out how to make tool calls - because LMStudio by default uses a 32K input window, which is smaller than OpenCode's prompt, so half of the instructions were being pruned from the middle!

▲dofm 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Yes — there is a setting for that isn't there. And as soon as you realise there's a setting for that, you have new knowledge.

Qwen barely needs any of Opencode's prompt, in my experience; I think I cut it down to about three general lines I found by googling. Mainly you need only a pre-amble to make sure that the plan mode, plan switch and build mode prompt fragments make sense.

Gemma 4 also needs almost nothing at all, which is fascinating, considering it is not a coding-specialist model. It just seems to be who you need it to be when you ask.

▲ricardobayes 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

For the most part you can just download LM Studio and go from there. It provides a chat interface and an easy-to-use interface to browse, load and use LLM models. The engine: it is abstracted away by LM Studio, if you want to dig deep it's llama.cpp as the runtime. Weights are the files what you download, they are the models for practical purposes.

▲dofm 4 hours ago | parent [-]

I definitely would recommend LM Studio as a learning environment, because it surfaces a bunch of things in relatively clear-minded ways. I am very grateful for it.

▲codazoda 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I agree with the learning aspect, but I have another motivation. I suspect that closed models might become too expensive to run for personal hobbyist use. I’ve been planning to buy a 64GB machine just to allow the limited local models this enables.

▲ricardobayes 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I'd say give it some time for the dust to settle. This field badly needs standardized benchmarks even before the conversation around model goodness can start.

▲not_kurt_godel 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> Having a machine that can run some modest local LLMs, like the Gemma 4 12B, is really worth it.

Agree having a powerful machine is really worth it in general for professionals, but strong disagree that running local LLMs has anything to do with it. It's hard enough as it is getting a good ROI on your time/money prompting/wrangling with frontier models. IMO leaning on the comparatively limited capabilities of local LLMs is best avoided in favor of keeping your own personal coding skills fresh and continuing to learn new ones.

▲dofm 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I'm not that bothered about my coding skills, which are fine, and pretty up-to-date considering I'm now an old bloke. I am bothered about building an instinctive understanding that helps me deal with my anxieties and decide whether I want to carry on with this working life or quit.

I needed to do this, this way, in my own time, to put my brain back together. It has worked for me, which is why I recommend it.

YMMV.

▲ricardobayes 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Unfortunately the local llm bunch is not the most emphatetic one in my experience: you are somehow "expected" to immediately know all this stuff and god forbid you ask the wrong question. I've never seen or felt this level of bullying and weird vibes over tools and LLM models. "My setup works for you or beat it".

▲sanderjd 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Where has that been your experience? My experience interacting with people about this is almost entirely in HN threads like this one, and I haven't found what you're saying here to be the case.

But if this is the case, as you say, it seems like a good opportunity to build a more welcoming set of entry points into this!

▲dofm 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

There's also a lot of cargo-cult stuff, isn't there? Especially in the Reddit groups. Just do XYZ. And people ask why and they are never around to explain. Because, perhaps, they can't.

(Very reminiscent of 3D printing, where you get a lot of very trivial advice poorly applied, which is an analogy I've now made several times.)

Several of the youtubers are pretty helpful, though; I watched half a dozen things and absorbed the broad pattern and then went for it.

Also I got a lot out of reading HN comments, which is why I am here; tucked away in the corners of these discussions are people who can help. Over time I hope I am one.

▲sanderjd 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Continuing to learn new ones, like what?

To me, "how do contemporary AI systems work and interact with contemporary hardware and how can I best take advantage of their capabilities?" is the set of skills that are worth learning at this moment.

What else is there? New / additional programming languages? New / additional database systems? frameworks? orchestrators? cloud provider / infra tooling? architectural patterns?

I dunno, all of this seems really boring and "been there done that" to me at this moment in time!

▲not_kurt_godel 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Yes, that all tracks, and all of those skills are worth maintaining and improving. Great to tinker with LLMs locally hands-on to learn, and having a powerful enough machine to enable that to a reasonable degree is just one of many reasons why it's worth it. I'm just saying that IMO "how can I best take advantage" lands firmly in the bucket of only cloud-hosted frontier models being worth my time. I would speculate that holds true for a large portion of the wider HN audience but YMMV of course.

▲sanderjd 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Maybe. I felt this way a year ago and definitely two years ago. But now my sense is that it's played out at this point, and the valuable thing to build expertise on now - precisely because I think it's coming rather than here - is local / open weights / hybrid models and harnesses.

▲rusk 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> I totally struggled to find the right frame of mind to explore any of this stuff without feeling defeated and bamboozled.

I found LM studio to be a nice starting point. Frindlier and more featureful than Ollama and not as intimidating as llama.cpp (though you will want to use that eventually)

▲dofm 6 hours ago | parent [-]

LM Studio is also nice because of the way the interface explains things; parameters have explanations and hints. It has been designed by people who really care about making it understandable.

I tried Ollama but I've settled on Unsloth Studio generally; once things really settle down I'll just run the llama-server UI, which is pretty nice.

A friend is tinkering with LLMs for amusement on a 16GB Raspberry Pi 5, and when I explained that llama.cpp now had a typical web chat interface he was so happy — it's amazing what the "table stakes" are now.

▲oceanplexian 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Honestly your best bet is to buy a $20 Claude subscription, ask Claude to set it all up with Pi and llama.cpp and come back in 20 minutes after a cup of coffee. This is also a good idea because it will help set expectations of what a local model can do vs. a frontier model.

▲mullen 5 hours ago | parent [-]

This is what I did after struggling to get llama.cpp working at a decent speed on my M1 Macbook. The secret is to very specific with your needs and targeted in what you are using llama.cpp for. Mine setup is just about strictly for qwen3-coder and now, I get a fairly decent speed out of it. I also installed Cursor to check Claude and it all worked out well.

▲cyanydeez 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I've setup to local paradigms for local coding:

- opencode with it's webui

- deer-flow with it's research/powered front end

They both run websites so you don't have to baby sit them (eg, keep your mac open). I've build a pdf compressor over a few days by first having deer flow try and research the frameworks and pipeline. It stalls out because its not really a fluid programmer. Once it stalls out, I transferred it (manually for now) to opencode and it's refactoring it because it's just a collective bundle of sticks and it needs a lot of testing to tweak out the limited scop context. LLMs can't really hold large scopes (locally anyway, from what I've read from HN, it's possible with longer context).

It'll complete in a few days with maybe 3-4 hours of full attention interaction, but it's running 3x that without my attention. Obviously, if I paid more attention it'd run quicker, but since it's local, it's not pumping out large volumes of code, it's mostly looping over tests and capabilities as observed.

It's running Qwen3.6 35B MoE on a AMD 128GB strix halo. If I switched to the dense models, perhaps it'd be smarter, but the trade off seems to be much slower gen.

▲dofm 6 hours ago | parent [-]

> - opencode with it's webui

Have you tried Paseo?

I have opencode in a VM, and the paseo daemon running in the VM, and then the Paseo Mac app. Really nice.

(You can also use the Opencode GUI to frame a remote opencode web interface)

▲c-hendricks 6 hours ago | parent [-]

You can also just add OpenCode web as a PWA, if that's what you mean by "frame".

I'm gonna check out paseo, but am not looking forward to all the ram the agent needs + all the ram paseo needs

▲c-hendricks an hour ago | parent [-]

Have checked out Paseo, not sure what it offers over opencode web though. Definitely seems great if you're using other harnesses, but it seems like all it has over opencode web is split views and native apps. Neither of those really matter to me, plus you lose some opencode goodies. The preview urls are a neat idea, but our dev servers at work are mostly port independent and required to be on a certain subdomain for auth.

▲bsder 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> I totally struggled to find the right frame of mind to explore any of this stuff without feeling defeated and bamboozled. Because it's just huge, exhausting, jargon-drenched, unknowable, and I am over the hill at fifty-plus.

Hello, my brother, just know that you have a fellow passenger in life at the same age who thinks the same thing. I agree that the local stuff is helping my understanding a LOT.

However, my gut feel as someone who got to experience the TeleBomb after the DotBomb is that the obfuscation is INTENTIONAL--it's neither you nor your age. I remember asking people to explain to me what the OC-768 startup endgame was when roughly 10 OC-768 links could carry the world's traffic at the time--and everybody giving me blank looks. The AI Bubble has the EXACT same feel as the Telecom Bubble--just bigger.

What I really wish is that I could find a VPS-type provider where I could toss things into their NVIDIA/AMD machines for an hour or two. Alas, all of the providers seem to want massive paperwork and huge minimum purchases.

I can't wait for the bubble to pop so that we mere mortals can finally build with this stuff.

▲ddalex 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

I just got Claude to download and install all the models and servers and agents and prepare all the launch scripts for me... no need to learn, just ask it to do it for you

▲dofm 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Right, but I am a middle-aged bloke who is experiencing existential angst about whether I can carry on in this industry.

I have a pretty deep, maybe paranoid need to be confident I have an intrinsic understanding, and I have found in my life that lessons come to you when you make yourself open to learning.

So I need to build on top of what I know, taking as much of the hard way as I can bear to take at any one time — it has to be not quite difficult enough to put me off.

I can't really explain what I have learned this way that is different, but I feel it in a way that I wouldn't if I'd simply pushed a button.

For the same reason, I have a really basic 3D printer that I've set up myself, set up Klipper, configured how I want it, learned how to calibrate, all that. And now I can say that I feel I have an understanding of 3D printing. I could hold my head above water in a discussion with a real expert, maybe find work in an adjacent field where my insights would keep me grounded.

I can afford a really good printer that has all that set up, and more, has no problems. But I'd just be someone who has a 3D printer.

(Also who am I kidding about the existence of a printer with no problems)

▲greyskull 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

This really resonates with me, and I'm only a decade and change into my career. I use claude a lot day to day. I try to use it sensibly, making me more productive and produce better work. I'm also trying not to lose understanding along the way. I want to be able to actually talk to the conclusions I'm reaching.

I have colleagues that seem perfectly content to delegate too much to the agents, and it saddens me. It feels like there will be swaths of engineers that didn't train some of the critical thinking skills that I take for granted.

I certainly see it in slack discourse around anything more complicated than a feature implementation. Maybe I'm just cynical. Time will tell, I suppose.

▲bluGill 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

You will not live enough to learn everything. Eventually you have to say "I could figure [something] out but I won't take that time." Most things are that way - I probably could learn brain surgery (I used this example because it has a reputation of being a very difficult course of study). I would like to make a lathe from scratch - but I don't have easy access to enough iron ore to get started - even if I start from scrap metal, I probably wouldn't spend months making my own surface plate (...) and so I own a factory made lathe instead.

That is why I'm content to delegate to agents - I have more code/features I want to write than I have time to debug (writing is the easy part).

▲sanderjd 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

For me (about halfway between you and dofm in my career by your own statements in this thread), it's a dream at the moment. I can delegate all the tedious stuff that I've done "the hard way" a thousand times already and feel I have very little of value remaining to learn, so that I can spend more time on all the things that are actually new and thus much more interesting.

▲greyskull 4 hours ago | parent [-]

It's been a great multiplier for me in similar ways. The "dreamiest" thing has been that it has freed up time that I would normally have spent doing sprint work, to work on things that just don't make the cut until it's bad enough to deprioritize other work.

Over the last few months, I've been digging into performance problems with a high throughput service that my team owns. I started working on the problems in my own time, put out short and medium term improvements that legitimately avoided operational issues, and started developing an alternate architecture that should meaningfully address the problems for the long term.

I've learned new things and made improvements that probably wouldn't have ever gone in otherwise.

▲sanderjd 3 hours ago | parent [-]

Yes exactly. There is a narrative that it's driving everything toward low quality slop, but in my own work it's exactly the opposite. We're doing work on quality and performance that we never would have gotten to in the past.

I've spent my whole career being frustrated by the pile of low severity bugs and performance issues that "I could fix that if I could only justify putting a couple hours into it!". And now I can just fix all those. Nobody is going to question my use of time to write prompts and do code reviews of those things, when I can to my "real" work simultaneously.

▲sanderjd 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Yeah, this is just the engineer's mindset. It's not surprising that this is a popular view here, even if it is not (and does not need to be) the mainstream perspective.

▲greyskull 3 hours ago | parent [-]

> mainstream

What does "mainstream" refer to when we're talking about software development and LLMs? As opposed to "engineers".

▲sanderjd 2 hours ago | parent [-]

This is a very fair question! When I wrote this comment, I was definitely thinking of the "real" mainstream, i.e. users of llm chat to generate text, not software engineers.

But I think there is (and has always been) also a distinction between the "mainstream" of software developers vs people who are working on new tools and capabilities to be used by that "mainstream".

IMO it is certainly true that the most efficient and cost effective was to do "mainstream" software delivery at the moment is hosted frontier models. But for people thinking about "what's next?", it makes a ton of sense to be exploring different models in anticipation of a possible (but certainly not inevitable) sea change.

▲swiftcoder 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I don't necessarily think your answer is wrong for all people, but if you work in software... how do you plan to differentiate yourself from everyone else out there, if the depth of your understanding is "Claude can do it for me"?

▲dofm 5 hours ago | parent [-]

This ultimately is the discussion I am here for.

I mean one of the things I use a local LLM for, because I can, is to generate starter documentation. But I ask it to — I want it to give me overviews, plans, all that. It can make something bespoke for me.

I guess I could also ask it to do the work. But where do you draw the line?

The universal labour-saving device is the great provocation of the next 100 years I think, and both Star Trek and Wall-E have grappled with it.

▲coldtea 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

>no need to learn, just ask it to do it for you

And that's how skills die.

▲CamperBob2 6 hours ago | parent | next [-]

When's the last time you shoed a horse?

The reason I delegate so much of local LLM installation and administration to Claude Code is simply because there's no point learning practical things that will work completely differently in a couple of years, or in memorizing procedures that I'll forget long before I need to perform them again.

No longer having to sweat all the details is a Good Thing, not a Bad Thing.

▲dofm 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I am not sure I disagree, and I certainly don't mean to disagree very fervently.

But I think if you want to really learn to ride well, understand horses well, there might be some benefit in learning how to shoe a horse. At some level it should never only be someone else's job.

▲verdverm 5 hours ago | parent [-]

At the same time, most people can drive without understanding how a car works.

▲saganus 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

You actually do need some understanding of how a car works, no?

For example, you need to know it uses gasoline (or diesel), it requires oil changes every certain amount of time, break pad replacement, etc.

You also probably need to know that you can't operate cars over a certain amount of water, that you need a driver's license, stopping at red lights, etc.

Sure, you might not need to be a mechanic, but that's far from not understanding how a car works, which to me sounds similar to knowing how to shoe a horse, which is different than being a horse vet.

▲coldtea 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Yes, and they're all the worse, more at the mercy of car companies and mechanics, and less aware of the world they live and operate in, for it...

▲WickyNilliams 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

If I worked with horses for 8 hours a day I imagine the answer would be "recently"

▲psychoslave 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Having to shoe a horse never was a general skill.

Maybe a more apt analogy would be a skill like making fire without a lighter.

▲sanderjd 4 hours ago | parent [-]

Writing software never was never a general skill either though? Or am I misunderstanding your point?

▲psychoslave 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Yes, LLM are thrown through pretty much everyone digital life whether they like it or not, it's not just devs. It might even unlock exploring things that need code that average user wouldn't have dared to do before.

▲coldtea 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

>When's the last time you shoed a horse?

That skill died too, so what's your point?

▲CamperBob2 2 hours ago | parent [-]

Skills sometimes do that. What's your point?

▲coldtea an hour ago | parent [-]

Skills are good. They shouldn't do that.

▲charcircuit 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Except with AI models it's possible to make a backup of them creating a permanent artifact of a skill.

▲sorokod 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Then what is the point of ddalex?

▲dofm 6 hours ago | parent [-]

I think if you really don't feel the need to know the "why" of everything, sometimes this might be the right approach. It is quick, pragmatic, gets you started.

Maybe my biggest problem with the world of agentic AI, and the reason I am putting myself through learning it the way I am, is that the need to know the "why" of everything is so fundamental to me, that I don't know if there is any point to me without it.

So this is really the only way I know how to proceed.

▲sanderjd 4 hours ago | parent [-]

To me, this is just a question of specialization. Not everyone needs to be a "I understand how the system actually works" person. In fact, not many people need to be that person. But every system does need some of that person to exist!

And we happen to be discussing this on a forum where the type of people who will be the specialists for the kinda of systems we're discussing are likely to gather.

I'd be surprised if in my casual discussions out in the real world, I were to run into a lot of people who care exactly how all this works, to the extent that they want to invest significant money into hardware that allows them to run things themselves and dig into what's actually going on. But I'm not at all surprised to come across such people here! (Indeed, it would be very disappointed if I didn't!)

▲kdkdjduxnd 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[dead]