|
| ▲ | wakamoleguy 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| There is only zero incentive if the filter detects AI music reliably. It's still a race between effective detection and cost to generate content, isn't it? |
|
| ▲ | DrewADesign 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Unless they directly embed promotions in it. I could see this being an avenue for brand-derived fake artists. I wonder if they already have a policy for that and I wonder why it wouldn’t apply to, say, the beastie boys talking about adidas. |
|
| ▲ | suyash 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| They say only wholly produced music using AI can't be monetized, nothing stopping it's 95% AI and 5% Human. Also no concerete definitions of what that even means. |
| |
| ▲ | Imustaskforhelp 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | I think that they mentioned both wholly produced music or substantially produced music. I think that it will be a fuzzy line but for example in the case of 95% AI and 5% human probably won't work. |
|
|
| ▲ | yawnr 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| It won't be monetized until they create a new monetization policy where they get a greater revenue share from it. |
|
| ▲ | have_faith 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Why would someone doing that voluntarily tag their content as AI? they can make money by hiding it. |
