Remix.run Logo
pier25 3 hours ago

it won't be monetized so there's zero incentive to upload AI slop to Tidal

DrewADesign 3 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Unless they directly embed promotions in it. I could see this being an avenue for brand-derived fake artists. I wonder if they already have a policy for that and I wonder why it wouldn’t apply to, say, the beastie boys talking about adidas.

wakamoleguy 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

There is only zero incentive if the filter detects AI music reliably. It's still a race between effective detection and cost to generate content, isn't it?

yawnr 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

It won't be monetized until they create a new monetization policy where they get a greater revenue share from it.

have_faith 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Why would someone doing that voluntarily tag their content as AI? they can make money by hiding it.

suyash 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

They say only wholly produced music using AI can't be monetized, nothing stopping it's 95% AI and 5% Human. Also no concerete definitions of what that even means.

Imustaskforhelp 3 hours ago | parent [-]

I think that they mentioned both wholly produced music or substantially produced music. I think that it will be a fuzzy line but for example in the case of 95% AI and 5% human probably won't work.