| ▲ | pier25 3 hours ago | |||||||
it won't be monetized so there's zero incentive to upload AI slop to Tidal | ||||||||
| ▲ | DrewADesign 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Unless they directly embed promotions in it. I could see this being an avenue for brand-derived fake artists. I wonder if they already have a policy for that and I wonder why it wouldn’t apply to, say, the beastie boys talking about adidas. | ||||||||
| ▲ | wakamoleguy 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
There is only zero incentive if the filter detects AI music reliably. It's still a race between effective detection and cost to generate content, isn't it? | ||||||||
| ▲ | yawnr 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
It won't be monetized until they create a new monetization policy where they get a greater revenue share from it. | ||||||||
| ▲ | have_faith 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Why would someone doing that voluntarily tag their content as AI? they can make money by hiding it. | ||||||||
| ▲ | suyash 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
They say only wholly produced music using AI can't be monetized, nothing stopping it's 95% AI and 5% Human. Also no concerete definitions of what that even means. | ||||||||
| ||||||||