| ▲ | The open source DOCX editor submitted to HN a few weeks ago has been deleted |
| 66 points by gcanyon 5 hours ago | 29 comments |
| The github repo under eigenpal is gone. The web site at docx-editor is 503. No idea what's going on. |
|
| ▲ | dijksterhuis 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| i'd wager a guess that they gave up on their "experiment" the top comment on the show hn would seem quite apt if so https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46971202 |
|
| ▲ | tekacs 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| The original source (matching the latest published NPM version) is still at https://github.com/mhurhangee/patrick/tree/main/packages and Apache-2.0, so I imagine that someone who'd like a copy can pick it up from there. |
| |
|
| ▲ | anenefan 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| This link should be enough to work out the relevant links. [1] I would guess that they have lost access to a resource lately ... I've read there's a lot of that going around atm. [1] https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=thisisjedr |
| |
| ▲ | refulgentis 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | I clicked through and browsed the comments and clicked links. It does appear the links are not working as described. Is there something you’re throwing and I’m not catching? :) | | |
|
|
| ▲ | nathanstitt 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Also not affiliated but my open-source tinycld uses docx as the backend storage for its text package. Supports _most_ of the features (including comments and suggestions) but is still very young. It has a golang backend that reads/writes docx and translates to YJS that the editor reads for multi-user access. Has web/iOS/Android support. I found docx to be a very well documented format and a surprisingly good fit for this. https://tinycld.org has a live demo |
|
| ▲ | gcanyon 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I can't include the links because HN filters dead links. |
|
| ▲ | bratao 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Not affiliated but I been using https://github.com/superdoc-dev/superdoc and it is very good and compatible with many docx features. |
|
| ▲ | fsckboy 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| what was that item from just a day or so ago where an opensource project had said they developed using AI, and a developer said "take it down, you copied it from us" I thought of it because this project said they used AI ( https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48085993 ) |
|
| ▲ | darkteflon 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Oh man, that’s disappointing. We implemented this in a test environment and have been hammering on it. Would love to know what’s going on as it solves a real pain point for us. |
| |
| ▲ | d3Xt3r 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | There's plenty of open-source docx editors though? What makes eigenpal's editor so special? | | |
| ▲ | darkteflon 5 hours ago | parent [-] | | Could you recommend your picks in the space? Edit (since I can’t seem to reply directly) - to the commenter suggesting LibreOffice below: quite different things. This was a library for implementing reasonably high fidelity docx viewing / editing in the browser. | | |
| ▲ | rjsw 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | What is wrong with LibreOffice? | | |
| ▲ | nosioptar 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | The classic UI text is too damned small. You cannot easily increase it last time I checked. | |
| ▲ | jubilanti 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahahahaha How long do you have? |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | gcanyon 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I’m in exactly the same boat. I’ll have to look at some of the suggestions here |
|
|
| ▲ | rolph 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| it is forseeable that MS would be very interested in taking a security stance vs a very possible vector. |
| |
| ▲ | conartist6 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I was going to guess that they accused the author of copying code from Office. Was AI used in the project? Perhaps a model regurgitated copyrighted code leading to a sternly worded notice from legal...? | | |
| ▲ | conartist6 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Ooooh yeah. Looking through the author's past posts: "got a lot of skepticism because we're developing heavily with AI" So AI was in use. Then the author says that following the spec alone wasn't enough to get it working, they got "active community feedback" and fed that feedback into the AI until it worked just like Word. I have to think that if there were ANY conditions under which a model might output code that Microsoft legal would threaten to sue you for, these would be them | |
| ▲ | sulam 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | How do you copy code from Office? Is the source code public? | | |
| ▲ | conartist6 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I suspect the source code for at least some older versions of Office is absolutely in the training materials of some LLMs. There have been leaks before, and the early models were trained on the entire contents of the internet without regard to legality | |
| ▲ | slashdave 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Today's LLMs are perfectly capable of disassembling. |
| |
| ▲ | ForOldHack 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Clearly, it was the fault of the AI, and it should be thrown in jail. | | |
| ▲ | conartist6 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | I think this (if it is what happened) is a perfect demonstration of the dynamics. If you use AI to do things you couldn't have done on your own, you're copying off someone else's homework and the real risk is that you don't know who you're copying from, but they probably do. |
|
| |
| ▲ | snowwrestler 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | A vector against a standardized XML+ZIP document format? | | |
| ▲ | dofm 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | ‘’ <—— li’l Dr Evil air quotes to put around ‘standardized’ ;-) If anything it’s DOCX itself that was the vector! | | |
|
|
