| ▲ | utilize1808 2 hours ago |
| Have you seen legitimate corporates use cracked software? If you do, then your competitors will report you; your employees will blackmail you. The risk is too great. |
|
| ▲ | 0x3f 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| This assumes the same reward ratio also continues, but that's not the case. A cutting edge LLM is something much more valuable than a cracked copy of Word. Just like the LLM providers themselves decided violating copyright was an acceptable risk, it entirely depends on how people see the tradeoffs, rather than being a categorical decision. |
| |
| ▲ | utilize1808 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | While that might be true, it is unlikely that open source models' capability will ever surpass frontier models --- if you have the best model (by some margin), then people will want to access it, even if it means going through compliance. | | |
| ▲ | gizzlon 40 minutes ago | parent [-] | | > it is unlikely that open source models' capability will ever surpass frontier models Sure about that? Would you invest in products almost no-one can buy? otoh, maybe China stop releasing their best models | | |
| ▲ | utilize1808 20 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Yes, that's what I meant. It's not that the Chinese will never be able to come up with models that superior --- it's simply that they will no longer have the incentive to open-source them once their models take the lead. Training models are expensive. No one can do it for free for very long. | | |
| ▲ | gizzlon 7 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Maybe, or maybe they would take this opportunity to gain a lot of power and influence around the world. Just because you're not paying per token or per month does not mean they are doing it for free. |
|
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | microgpt 18 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I've seen "legitimate companies" commit piracy on a scale that well exceeds all cracked software piracy combined. |
|
| ▲ | jauco an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| He said copyright infringement. The company tfa is about literally trained its models using massive copyright infringement. |
|
| ▲ | Daishiman 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Then they'll outsource dev work to agencies that have no frills with it and move along. |
| |
| ▲ | utilize1808 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | As a company it is your responsibility to ensure your contractors are compliant. So won't work. | | |
| ▲ | civet_java an hour ago | parent [-] | | I see your comments scattered across this thread with most converging on this thesis: "The US govt will regulate away the ability of US corporations and individuals to use unsanctioned AI models." Which is a fair thesis. I've seen you counter people's predictions of how they think things will pan as a consequence. But what I'd really like to hear is what you think happens (in the US and internationally) as a consequence of such regulations? | | |
| ▲ | utilize1808 9 minutes ago | parent [-] | | USA will experience unprecedented prosperity from influx of global talents and capital who seek to amplify their productivity and profits by 10x. |
|
|
|